green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1997 ·
…when an amended pleading is filed, it operates as a waiver of the original pleading. the original pleading drops out of the case and although it remains in the file, it cannot serve as the basis for any future judgment. . . .
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Caswell v. Bristol Hospital, No. Cv 95-0469665s (Aug. 14, 1997)
(2×)
when an amended pleading is filed, it operates as a waiver of the original pleading. the original pleading drops out of the case and although it remains in the file, it cannot serve as the basis for any future judgment. . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hryniewicz
(2×)
See Wilson v. Hryniewicz, 38 Conn.App. 715 , 663 A.2d 1073 (1995), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 918 , 665 A.2d 610 (1995). 3 .Section § 52-397 of the Connecticut General Statutes provides in relevant part: Any judgment debtor, an execution against whom has been returned unsatisfied .. .may be examined on oath, in the court location where the judgment was rendered, concerning his property and means of paying such judgment, before any judge of the superior court... .The judgment creditor or his attorney may provide for the service of a subpoena or subpoena *16 duces tecum on the judgment debtor for …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Barrett
(2×)
See State v. Rogers, 38 Conn. App. 777, 787 , 664 A.2d 291 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 918 , 665 A.2d 610 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
DiNapoli v. Cooke
(2×)
See Wilson v. Hryniewicz, 38 Conn. App. 715, 720 , 663 A.2d 1073 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 918 , 665 A.2d 610 (1995); DeLuca v. DeLuca, 37 Conn. App. 586, 588 , 657 A.2d 690 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
D'Amico v. Johnson, No. Cv 96 0564655 S (Dec. 11, 1997)
See also Wilson v. Hryniewicz, 38 Conn. App. 715 , 719-20 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 918 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
REGINALD ROGERS
v.
REGINALD ROGERS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 28, 1995.
Lawrence R. Pellett, special public defender, in support of the petition., Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (2)
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 777 (AC 13388), is denied.