green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
(2×)
See State v. Scarpiello, 40 Conn. App. 189, 212 , 670 A.2d 856 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 921 , 674 A.2d 1327 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jefferson
(2×)
See State v. Scarpiello, 40 Conn. App. 189, 213 , 670 A.2d 856 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 921 , 674 A.2d 1327 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. McNair
(2×)
See State v. Scarpiello, 40 Conn. App. 189, 206-207 , 670 A.2d 856 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 921 , 674 A.2d 1327 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Spillane
(2×)
“In a case . . . where a defendant did not, and apparently could not, bring forth facts contesting the omitted element, answering the question whether the jury verdict would have been the same absent the error does not fundamentally undermine the purposes of the jury trial guarantee.” Neder v. United States, supra, 527 U.S. 19 ; see also State v. Scarpiello, 40 Conn. App. 189, 212 , 670 A.2d 856 , cert. denied, 236 Conn. 921 , 674 A.2d 1327 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JOSEPH R. SCARPIELLO
v.
JOSEPH R. SCARPIELLO
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 5, 1996.
Suzanne Zitser, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Berdon.
Published
BERDON, J.,
dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification.