green
Positive treatment
8.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Petion
But see State v. Huckabee , 41 Conn. App. 565 , 570-71, 677 A.2d 452 ("[a] bullet wound is not per se serious physical injury"), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 903 , 682 A.2d 1009 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
The lack of a recusal hearing leaves the record bereft of any factual basis upon which we may base our review." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Olson v. Olson , 71 Conn.App. 826 , 830, 804 A.2d 851 (2002) ; accord State v. Teel , 42 Conn.App. 500 , 506, 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996) ; State v. Weber , 6 Conn.App. 407 , 412-13, 505 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 199 Conn. 810 , 508 A.2d 771 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark v. Neundorf
This court has repeatedly stated the proposition that “[i]t is the substance of a motion . . . that governs its outcome, rather than how it is characterized in the title given to it by the movant.” State v. Taylor, 91 Conn. App. 788, 792 , 882 A2d 682 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 928 , 889 A.2d 819 (2005); see Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480, 489 , 680 A.2d 316 (proposition that motion is to be decided on basis of substance rather than on form or label affixed to motion), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996). 6 The trial court did not expressly state that its rea…
discussed
Cited "see"
Moraski v. Connecticut Board of Examiners of Embalmers & Funeral Directors
See State v. Teel, 42 Conn. App. 500, 506-507 , 681 A.2d 974 (concluding that defendant’s failure to comply with rules of practice requirement of written motion for recusal with affidavit setting forth facts supporting bias claim deprived court of adequate record for review as required under first prong of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 [1989]), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996); see also State v. Marcisz, 99 Conn. App. 31, 38-39 , 913 A.2d 436 (concluding that defendant’s unpreserved claim of judicial bias was not of constitutional magnitude and th…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Kevin K.
(2×)
See State v. Huckabee, 41 Conn. App. 565, 575 , 677 A.2d 452 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 903 , 682 A.2d 1009 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. JOSE G.
(2×)
See State v. Teel, 42 Conn. App. 500, 504 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bijur v. Bijur
See Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480, 489 , 680 A.2d 316 (when case requires court to determine nature of pleading, court not required to accept precise label affixed to that pleading), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Aggen
See Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480, 489 , 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tisdale v. Riverside Cemetery Ass'n
See Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480, 489 , 680 A.2d 316 (when case requires court to determine nature of pleading filed by party, courts not required to accept precise label affixed to that pleading by moving party), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewczyk v. Connecticut Dph, No. Cv 00-0596677 (Dec. 10, 2002)
See Drahan v. Board of Education , 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rome v. Album
The court did have the authority to treat the defendant’s motion to clarify as a motion to open and to grant the defendant’s requested relief where the defendant’s motion (1) came within the four month period established by § 52-212a; (2) put the plaintiff on notice as to the effect of the relief requested despite the label affixed to the motion; see Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480, 489 , 680 A.2d 316 (“[w]hen a case requires this court to determine the nature of a pleading filed by a party, we are not required to accept the label affixed to that pleading by the party�…
cited
Cited "see"
Sperow v. Region 7, No. Cv 00-0085019 S (Aug. 29, 2001)
See Drahan v. Board of Education , 42 Conn. App. 480 , 490 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
New Milford S.B. v. Jajer, No. Cv 92-0061073 (Jan. 2, 2001)
See Drahan v. Board of Education , 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Labroad v. McEleney, No. Cv97-0482695s (May 4, 2000)
See Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996); see also Boucher Agency, Inc. v. Zimmer, 160 Conn. 404 , 409 , 279 A.2d 540 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hackling v. Casbro Construction, Rhode Island, No. 368552 (Feb. 28, 2000)
"Adherence to th[e]se procedures is necessary to obtain proper judicial review." State v. Santangelo, 205 Conn. 578 , 585 , 534 A.2d 1175 (1987); see State v. Teel , 42 Conn. App. 500 , 506-07 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996) (failure to comply with Practice Book rule re recusal deems record inadequate for review under first prong of Evans-Golding test ).
cited
Cited "see"
Palmieri v. Lee, No. 405641 (Nov. 24, 1999)
See Drahan v. Board of Education , 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Askew
(2×)
See State v. Gettes, 42 Conn. App. 472, 478 , 680 A.2d 996 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1009 (1996) (fifteen days); State v. Sims, 12 Conn. App. 239, 242 , 530 A.2d 1069 , cert. denied, 206 Conn. 801 , 535 A.2d 1315 (1987) (thirty-five minutes).
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Lindsay, No. 389401 (Jul. 6, 1999)
See Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Orta v. Rivera, No. 408173 (Nov. 10, 1998)
See Drahan v. Board of Education , 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burton v. Statewide Grievance Committee, No. Cv97 0573377 (Sep. 24, 1998)
See State v. Cook , 183 Conn. 520 , 521-23 , 441 A.2d 41 (1981)." State v. Weber , 6 Conn. App. 407 , 412 , 505 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 199 Conn. 810 , 508 A.2d 771 (1986). "`It is axiomatic that the burden of establishing a record that a judicial impropriety has occurred which demonstrates or gives the appearance of bias or partiality so as to require recusal rests with the party who claims the occurrence of such an impropriety.' State v. Santangelo , 205 Conn. 578 , 584 , 534 A.2d 1175 (1987)." State v. Teel , 42 Conn. App. 500 , 506 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Norse Systems, Inc. v. Tingley Systems, Inc.
See State v. Cook, 183 Conn. 520, 521-23 , 441 A.2d 41 (1981).” State v. Weber, 6 Conn. App. 407, 412 , 505 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 199 Conn. 810 , 508 A.2d 771 (1986). “ ‘It is axiomatic that the burden of establishing a record that a judicial impropriety has occurred which demonstrates or gives the appearance of bias or partiality so as to require recusal rests with the party who claims the occurrence of such an impropriety.’ State v. Santangelo, 205 Conn. 578, 584 , 534 A.2d 1175 (1987).” State v. Teel, 42 Conn. App. 500, 506 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Marinaccio v. Zaczynski, No. Cv 96 0565991 (May 14, 1998)
Boucher Agency, Inc. v. Zimmer, 160 Conn. 404 , 409 , 279 A.2d 540 (1971); see Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996); Camp v. Chase, 39 Conn. Sup. 264 , 267 n. 1, 476 A.2d 1087 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Brien v. Coburn
See State v. Teel, 42 Conn. App. 500, 506-507 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996) (failure to comply with Practice Book § 997 deems record inadequate for review under first prong of Evans-Golding test); States.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Askew
“In the absence of such a request, we have, in the past, declined to review a defendant’s claim under similar circumstances.” State v. Rogers, 38 Conn. App. 777, 787 , 664 A.2d 291 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 918 , 665 A.2d 610 (1995); see State v. Teel, 42 Conn. App. 500, 504 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996); State v. Casado, 42 Conn. App. 371, 374-75 , 680 A.2d 981 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 920 , 682 A.2d 1006 (1996); State v. Hermann, 38 Conn. App. 56, 65 , 658 A.2d 148 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 903 , 665 A.2d 904 (1995); State v. Jones, 34 Conn. App. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antonio A. v. Commissioner of Correction
A court has broad discretion to treat a motion for clarifi- cation of a judgment or a motion to reargue a judgment as a motion to open and modify the judgment . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Silver v. Silver, 200 Conn. App. 505, 520 , 238 A.3d 823 , cert. denied, 335 Conn. 973 , 240 A.3d 1055 (2020); see also Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480, 489 , 680 A.2d 316 (‘‘[w]hen a case requires this court to determine the nature of a pleading filed by a party, we are not required to accept the label affixed to that pleading by the party’’), cert. denied, 239 Co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chiccarello v. Ghallilli, No. Cv00-034 03 57 S (Jun. 10, 2002)
"Connecticut courts have permitted the use of the motion for summary judgment to contest the legal sufficiency of a complaint, even though the sufficiency is more appropriately challenged by a motion to strike." Orr v. Hartford Accident Indemnity , Superior Court, judicial district of New Britain, Docket No. 482838 (July 12, 1999, Robinson, J. ) ( 25 Conn.L.Rptr. 122 ); see also Drahan v. Board of Education , 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blake v. Vanu, No. Cv97 034 24 00 S (Jan. 7, 2000)
See, e.g., Drahan v. Board of Education , CT Page 275 42 Conn. App. 480 , 498 n. 17, 680 A.2d 316 (1996), cert. denied 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1996); Burke v. Avitabile , 32 Conn. App. 765 , 772 , 630 A.2d 624 (1993), cert denied 228 Conn. 908 , 634 A.2d 297 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weyel v. Catania
State v. Weber, 6 Conn. App. 407, 412-13 , 505 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 199 Conn. 810 , 508 A.2d 771 (1986).” State v. Santangelo, 205 Conn. 578, 585 , 534 A.2d 1175 (1987); see also State v. Teel, 42 Conn. App. 500, 506-507 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996) (failure to comply with Practice Book § 997 deems record inadequate for review under first prong of Evans-Golding test).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Satti v. Code Enforcement Committee, No. 544395 (Jun. 8, 1998)
See also Drahan v. Board of Education, 42 Conn. App. 480 , 489 , 680 A.2d 316 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1000 (1997).
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
LEROY GETTES
v.
LEROY GETTES
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 18, 1996.
Suzanne Zitser, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 472 (AC 15359), is denied.