green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sweet
See State v. Henderson, 47 Conn. App. 542, 554 , 706 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 908 , 713 A.2d 829 (1998) (‘‘[I]t is a reasonable and logical inference for a juror to conclude that a card referred to as a credit card enables one to receive things on credit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Idlibi v. State Dental Commission
See State v. Henderson, 47 Conn. App. 542, 558 , 706 A.2d 480 (‘‘[a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 244 Conn. 908 , 713 A.2d 8298 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Papallo v. Lefebvre
See State v. Henderson , 47 Conn.App. 542 , 558-59, 706 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 908 , 713 A.2d 829 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Grosso v. Grosso
See State v. Henderson, 47 Conn. App. 542, 558 , 706 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 908 , 713 A.2d 829 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hackling v. Casbro Construction of Rhode Island, No. 368552 (Feb. 28, 2000)
"Where counsel does not request a curative instruction or seek a mistrial, `he presumably does not view the remarks as so prejudicial that his client's right to a fair trial is seriously jeopardized.' State v. Falcone, 191 Conn. 12 , 23 n. 13, 463 A.2d 558 (1983)." State v. Lubesky, 195 Conn. 475 , 484 , 488 A.2d 1239 (1985); see State v. Henderson, 47 Conn. App. 542 , 557 , 706 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 908 , 713 A.2d 829 (1998); State v. Maturo, 188 Conn. 591 , 597 , 452 A.2d 642 (1982); State v. Bradley, 12 Conn. App. 163 , 167-68 , 529 A.2d 1343 , cert. denied, 205 Conn. 810 , 532…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Belanger
See State v. Henderson, 47 Conn. App. 542, 558 , 706 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 244 Conn. 908 , 713 A.2d 829 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jessica B.
See State v. Henderson, 47 Conn. App. 542, 558 , 706 A.2d 480 , cert denied, 244 Conn. 908 , 713 A.2d 829 (1998); State v. Teel, 42 Conn. App. 500, 504 , 681 A.2d 974 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 921 , 682 A.2d 1012 (1996); State v. Harrison, 34 Conn. App. 473, 487 , 642 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 907 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
MITCHELL HENDERSON
v.
MITCHELL HENDERSON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 17, 1998.
Craig A. Raabe and James P. Ray, special public defenders, in support of the petition., Harry Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 542 (AC 15998), is denied.