Doyle v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins., 719 A.2d 1163 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Doyle v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins., 719 A.2d 1163 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bruno v. The Travelers Companies (connappct, 2017-05-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bruno v. The Travelers Companies
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, once the defendants raised the issue of absolute immunity, based on the application of the litigation privilege, and the court then determined that the plaintiff's initial complaint was barred by the doctrine of absolute immunity, the court should have dismissed the case against the defendants, essentially treating the motion to strike as a motion to dismiss. 6 See Practice Book § 10-30 (a) (1) ("[a] motion to dismiss shall be used to assert ... lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter"); see generally Branford v. Monaco , 48 Conn.App. 216 , 219 n.4, 709 A.2d 582 (although "[t]he de…
cited Cited "see" Ramos v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction , 48 Conn.App. 230 , 233, 716 A.2d 894 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 902 , 719 A.2d 1163 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Petitte v. DSL. Net, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Branford v. Monaco, 48 Conn. App. 216, 222 , 709 A.2d 582 (“[m]ere assertions of fact . . . are insufficient to establish the existence of a material fact” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 903 , 719 A.2d 900 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction, 48 Conn. App. 230 , 716 A.2d 894 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 902 , 719 A.2d 1163 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Dime Savings Bank v. Arpaia
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction, 48 Conn. App. 230, 234 , 716 A.2d 894 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 902 , 719 A.2d 1163 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Presnick v. Freedom of Information Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mejia v. Commissioner, 48 Conn. App. 230 , 234 n.5, 716 A.2d 894 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 902 , 719 A.2d 1163 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SEAN DOYLE
v.
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
SC 15939.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 15, 1998.
719 A.2d 1163
Bernard, Pellegrino, in support of the petition., Karen T. Gerber, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 902 (AC 17006), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the tortfeasor’s vehicle is not underinsured when the tort-feasor has a $100,000 liability policy and the plaintiff has a $100,000/$300,000 split limit uninsured motorist policy in circumstances where, due to the existence of multiple claimants, the plaintiffs recovery under the tortfeasor’s policy is less than $100,000?”

[*904] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15939. Bernard, Pellegrino, in support of the petition. Karen T. Gerber, in opposition. Decided May 15, 1998