Cotto v. United Tech. Corp., 717 A.2d 233 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Cotto v. United Tech. Corp., 717 A.2d 233 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Denya (connappct, 2008-05-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Denya
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Medley, 48 Conn. App. 662, 665 , 711 A.2d 1191 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 915 , 718 A.2d 19 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
Conn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cotto v. United Technologies Corp., 48 Conn. App. 618 , 711 A.2d 1180 , cert. granted, 245 Conn. 915 , 717 A.2d 233 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Mireles v. Texas Department of Public Safety
Tex. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See., e.g., Settani v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 48 Conn.App. 418 , 710 A.2d 816, 817 (1998) (1994 amendment to Pennsylvania license suspension statute ''eliminated the requirement that the hearing officer make a finding of the level of the operator’s BAC at the time of operation and allowed the commissioner to suspend the license if the breath tests were administered within two hours of the time of operation and revealed an illegal level at the time of testing”), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 915 , 719 A.2d 1167 (1998); Fitzgerald & Hume, 66 Mass. L.Rev. at 36 (recommending a breath sampl…
discussed Cited "see" Lewis v. Swan
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cotto v. United Technologies Corp., 48 Conn. App. 618, 624-25 , 711 A.2d 1180 , cert. granted on other grounds, 245 Conn. 915 , 717 A.2d 233 (1998); Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 742 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GONZALO COTTO
v.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT DIVISION
SC 15963.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 25, 1998.
717 A.2d 233
Karen Lee Torre, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 618 (AC 16670) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the plaintiffs expression or his refusal to display a political symbol was not protected by the first amendment to the United States constitution or by article first of the constitution of Connecticut?”