green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Denya
See State v. Medley, 48 Conn. App. 662, 665 , 711 A.2d 1191 , cert. denied, 245 Conn. 915 , 718 A.2d 19 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
See Cotto v. United Technologies Corp., 48 Conn. App. 618 , 711 A.2d 1180 , cert. granted, 245 Conn. 915 , 717 A.2d 233 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mireles v. Texas Department of Public Safety
See., e.g., Settani v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 48 Conn.App. 418 , 710 A.2d 816, 817 (1998) (1994 amendment to Pennsylvania license suspension statute ''eliminated the requirement that the hearing officer make a finding of the level of the operator’s BAC at the time of operation and allowed the commissioner to suspend the license if the breath tests were administered within two hours of the time of operation and revealed an illegal level at the time of testing”), cert. denied, 245 Conn. 915 , 719 A.2d 1167 (1998); Fitzgerald & Hume, 66 Mass. L.Rev. at 36 (recommending a breath sampl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Swan
See Cotto v. United Technologies Corp., 48 Conn. App. 618, 624-25 , 711 A.2d 1180 , cert. granted on other grounds, 245 Conn. 915 , 717 A.2d 233 (1998); Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 742 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GONZALO COTTO
v.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT DIVISION
v.
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT DIVISION
SC 15963.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 25, 1998.
Karen Lee Torre, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 618 (AC 16670) is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the plaintiffs expression or his refusal to display a political symbol was not protected by the first amendment to the United States constitution or by article first of the constitution of Connecticut?”