green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Russo
(2×)
See State v. Pelella, supra, 327 Conn. 19 ; see also State v. Taupier, supra, 197 Conn. App. 796 ; see generally State v. McMillan, 51 Conn. App. 676, 686 , 725 A.2d 342 (dis- missal of information is drastic action), cert. denied, 248 Conn. 911 , 732 A.2d 179 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Peeler, No. Cr99 14 83 96 (Jul. 11, 2000)
(2×)
It is accorded only if the conditions fixed by statute and the rules of court for taking and prosecuting the appeal are met." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. SR Sanitation Services, Inc. , 202 Conn. 300 , 307 , 521 A.2d 1017 (1987); see also State v. McMillan , 51 Conn. App. 676 , 679-80 , 725 A.2d 342 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 911 , 732 A.2d 179 (1999).
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
SAMUEL MCMILLAN
v.
SAMUEL MCMILLAN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 30, 1999.
Richard E. Condon, Jr., deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 51 Conn. App. 676 (AC 16731), is denied.