green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Dipaolo
In his motion to dismiss the part B information, the defendant argued that (1) the application of the enhanced penalty violated his equal protection and due process rights; but see Kostrgewski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 52 Conn. App. 326, 342 , 727 A.2d 233 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 910 , 733 A.2d 227 (1999); and (2) the New York statute under which he was convicted, N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Reyes v. Bridgeport
See Kostrzewski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 52 Conn. App. 326 , 339 n.8, 727 A.2d 233 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 910 , 733 A.2d 227 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
See Kostrzewski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 52 Conn. App. 327, 344, 727 A.2d 233 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 910 , 733 A.2d 227 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Tenn
See, e.g., Kostrzewski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehi- cles, 52 Conn. App. 326 , 333–35, 727 A.2d 233 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 910 , 733 A.2d 227 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Tenn
See, e.g., Kostrzewski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehi- cles, 52 Conn. App. 326 , 333–35, 727 A.2d 233 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 910 , 733 A.2d 227 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glanz v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
See, e.g., State v. Courchesne, 296 Conn. 622 , 635 n.20, 998 A.2d 1 (2010). ‘‘In any event, [o]ur Supreme Court has repeatedly held that, as a general rule, the due process clauses of both the United States and Connecti- cut constitutions have the same meanings and impose similar limitations.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Kostrzewski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 52 Conn. App. 326 , 335 n.6, 727 A.2d 233 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 910 , 733 A.2d 227 (1999). 4 For purposes of § 14-227b, ‘‘elevated blood alcohol content’’ is defined as ‘‘a ratio of alcohol in th…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BARBARA KOSTRZEWSKI
v.
COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES
v.
COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 2, 1999.
Jeffrey D. Brownstein, in support of the petition., Robert L. Marconi, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 326 (AC 17359), is denied.