green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Benedict
See State v. Reed, 56 Conn. App. 428, 438-39 , 742 A.2d 1285 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 945 , 747 A.2d 524 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Amber S., (June 4, 2002)
(2×)
See In re Kasheema L ., 56 Conn. App. 484 , 489 , CT Page 7093 744 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 945 , 747 A.2d 522 (2000); C The third basis on which DCF seeks to terminate the mother's parental rights is that there is no ongoing parent-child relationship between the mother and Amber.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rysene W., (Jul. 9, 2001)
(2×)
In re Migdalia M ., supra, 6 Conn. App. 206 ; In re Passionique T ., 44 Conn. Sup. 551 , 564 , 695 A.2d 1107 (1996) ( Brenneman, J .); see In re Kasheema L ., 56 Conn. App. 484 , 490 n. 3, 744 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 945 , 747 A.2d 522 (2000) (parent who has obtained a job and remained drug free not necessarily rehabilitated).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE KASHEEMA L.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 8, 2000.
Mary Ann Barile, in support of the petition., Jane R. Rosenberg, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The respondent mother’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 484 (AC 17767), is denied.
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Jane R. Rosenberg, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided March 8, 2000