State v. Holmes, 761 A.2d 763 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Holmes, 761 A.2d 763 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Economos v. Liljedahl Bros., Inc. (connappct, 2004-12-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Economos v. Liljedahl Bros., Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
The agreement for submission constitutes the charter for the entire ensuing arbitration proceedings.” (Citations omitted; emphasis *583 added.) Vail v. American Way Homes, Inc., 181 Conn. 449, 451 , 435 A.2d 993 (1980); see Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224, 229 , 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Frillici v. Town of Westport
Conn. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224, 234-35 , 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lindo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hill, 58 Conn. App. 797 , 799-800 n.4, 755 A.2d 919 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 936 , 761 A.2d 763 (2000); see also State v. Geisler, 222 Conn. 672, 684-85 , 610 A.2d 1225 (1992) (providing tools of analysis to be used to construe contours of state constitution).
cited Cited "see" State v. Duteau
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Dwyer, 59 Conn. App. 207, 212 , 757 A.2d 597 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 937 , 761 A.2d 763 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Marchell v. Whelchel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Eaton, 59 Conn. App. 252, 259 , 755 A.2d 973 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 937 , 761 A.2d 763 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Local 1042 v. Board of Education of Norwalk
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224, 228 , 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rodriguez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Pierre, supra, 277 Conn. 75 (“hearsay rules and the [c]onfrontation [c]lause are generally designed to protect similar values . . . [but] [t]he [confrontation [cjlause . . . bars the admission of some evidence that would otherwise be admissible under an exception to the hearsay rule” [internal quotation marks omitted]); see also State v. Eaton, 59 Conn. App. 252, 265-66 , 755 A.2d 973 (analyzing cross-examination prong of Whelan under confrontation clause principles), cert. denied, 254 Conn. 937 , 761 A.2d 763 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Komondy (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See General Statutes § 52-419(a); see also Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 224, 228-29 , 755 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 254 Conn. 939 , 761 A.2d 760 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
WILLIAM HOLMES, JR.
SC 16410.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 25, 2000.
761 A.2d 763
Jeremiah Donovan, special public defender, in support of the petition., Peter A. McShane, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

No opinion found.Click here to view source material.