State v. Lomax, 763 A.2d 1042 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lomax, 763 A.2d 1042 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Finan (connappct, 2004-03-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Finan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lomax, 60 Conn. App. 602, 610 , 760 A.2d 957 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 920 , 763 A. 2d 1042 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Colon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
This standard applies to the admissibility of both hearsay testimony; see State v. Lomax, 60 Conn. App. 602, 607-608 , 760 A.2d 957 , cert. denied, 255 Conn. 920 , 763 A.2d 1042 (2000); and expert testimony.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
RICHARD LOMAX
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 20, 2000.
763 A.2d 1042
Mary Anne Royle, special public defender, in support of the petition., Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 602 (AC 18648), is denied.