Faught v. Edgewood Corners, Inc., 776 A.2d 1150 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Faught v. Edgewood Corners, Inc., 776 A.2d 1150 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (36 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Francis v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2014-07-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Francis v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Francis v. Warden, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford–New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. CV- XX-XXXXXXX (February 18, 1998), appeal dismissed, 63 Conn. App. 282 , 775 A.2d 1004 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1150 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Francis v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Francis v. Warden, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. CV-95-0550706 (February 18, 1998), appeal dismissed, 63 Conn. App. 282 , 775 A.2d 1004 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 933 , 776 A.2d 1150 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lopez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gray, 63 Conn. App. 151, 161 , 772 A.2d 747 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1151 (2001); see also State v. Irala, 68 Conn. App. 499, 525 , 792 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 887 , 123 S. Ct. 132 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Irala
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
Although the court may not have expressly mentioned the maximum sentence to the defendant prior to accepting her pleas, that singular fact is not dispositive of the defendant’s claim. 13 See State v. Silva, 65 Conn. App. 234, 242 , 783 A.2d 7 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 929 , 783 A.2d 1031 (2001); see State v. Gray, 63 Conn. App. 151, 159 , 772 A.2d 747 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1151 (2001). “[T]he constitutional mandate is not strict adherence to the rule but, rather, an understanding by the defendant of the actual sentencing possibilities.” (Internal quotation marks omitte…
discussed Cited "see" Treglia v. Zanesky (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Faught v. Edgewood, 63 Conn. App. 164, 172 , 772 A.2d 1142 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1150 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Kelley v. Tomas (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Faught v. Edgewood Corners, Inc., 63 Conn. App. 164, 172 , 772 A.2d 1142 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1150 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Silva
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gray, 63 Conn. App. 151, 159 , 772 A.2d 747 (plea knowingly and voluntarily entered when defendant knew maximum sentence for charged offenses), cert, denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1151 (2001); State v. Peterson, supra, 51 Conn. App. 658 , (plea knowing and voluntary where court advised defendant he “ ‘could face as long as forty-five years imprisonment’ ”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Baillargeon v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: compare · confidence low
Although our phrasing of the prejudice prong has not been uniform in previous instances where a party has claimed ineffective assistance on direct appeal; compare, e.g., State v. Gray, 63 Conn. App. 151, 161-62 , 772 A.2d 747 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1151 (2001), with State v. Louise-Julie, 60 Conn. App. 837, 840 , 762 A.2d 913 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 929 , 930, 767 A.2d 102 , 103 (2001); the prejudice prong has always existed in that the appellant has the burden of showing that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsel’s ineffective assistance, the resul…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KATHLEEN T. FAUGHT
v.
EDGEWOOD CORNERS, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 19, 2001.
776 A.2d 1150
William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition., John J. Resnik, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 164 (AC 19629), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.