State v. Stewart, 782 A.2d 1250 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Stewart, 782 A.2d 1250 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ruocco (connappct, 2014-07-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ruocco
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stewart, 60 Conn. App. 301 , 308–309, 759 A.2d 142 (no record of waiver and total omission of no unfavorable inference instruction plain error), remanded, 255 Conn. 913 , 763 A.2d 1039 (2000) (appeal withdrawn October 1, 2000), on remand, 64 Conn. App. 340 , 780 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).8 If we adopted the state’s reasoning, and concluded that the record is inadequate and, as a result, the defen- dant’s claim fails, that would place the burden on the defendant to provide a record sufficient to support the state’s waiver argument.
cited Cited "see" State v. Bharrat
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stewart, 64 Conn. App. 340, 352 , 780 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Diaz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stewart, 64 Conn. App. 340, 352 , 780 A.2d 209 (discussing role of defense counsel), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Maskiell
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stewart, 64 Conn. App. 340, 352 , 780 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Peters-Hamlin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sitkiewicz, 64 Conn. App. 108, 114 , 779 A.2d 782 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Marrero
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Sitkiewicz, 64 Conn. App. 108 , 114—15, 779 A.2d 782 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Elson (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Stewart, 64 Conn. App. 340, 352 , 780 A.2d 209 (discussing general obligation of defense counsel to raise objections on behalf of defendant), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cote
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 673-74 ; see also State v. Stewart, 64 Conn. App. 340, 349-50 , 780 A.2d 209 (“[a]bsent some indication to the contrary, a court is entitled to rely on counsel’s representations on behalf of his or her client”), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Roman
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Stewart, 64 Conn. App. 340, 349-50 , 780 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 909 , 782 A.2d 1250 (2001).
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
GLENN STEWART
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2001.
782 A.2d 1250
Richard E. Condon, Jr., assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 340 (AC 18813), is denied.

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.