State v. Beemer, 799 A.2d 296 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Beemer, 799 A.2d 296 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Francis D. (connappct, 2003-02-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Francis D.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Trotter, 69 Conn. App. 1, 18-20 , 793 A.2d 1172 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 932 , 799 A.2d 297 (2002).
cited Cited "see" State v. Thompson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Trotter, 69 Conn. App. 1, 11-12 , 793 A.2d 1172 (explaining application of plain error doctrine), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 932 , 799 A.2d 297 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Covington
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Williams , 231 Conn. 235 , 252, 645 A.2d 999 (1994) (evidence that defendant pulled small handgun out of his waist length jacket reasonably supported finding that handgun had barrel of less than twelve inches in length), overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Murray , 254 Conn. 472 , 487, 757 A.2d 578 (2000) ; see also State v. Trotter , 69 Conn. App. 1 , 7, 793 A.2d 1172 (2002) (evidence that defendant left crime scene with gun that he concealed in his coat pocket relied on to support finding that defendant carried firearm with barrel of less than twelve inches in length), …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Davis
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743 , 748-49 n.4, 513 A.2d 86 (“A statement’s inconsistency ... is not limited to cases in which diametrically opposed assertions have been made. . . . [IJnconsistencies may be found in changes in position and ... in denial[s] of recollection.”); see also State v. Trotter, 69 Conn. App. 1, 17-21 , 793 A.2d 1172 (victim’s testimony that he did not remember who had shot him was deemed to be inconsistent with victim’s prior statement to police identifying defendant as person who shot him), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 932 , 799 A.2d 297 (2002). 14 Section 6-6 o…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hersey
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
The witness’ claims of being under the influence of medications or the like are relevant for the jury to consider, but they “go to the weight of the evidence and not to its admissibility.” 5 State v. Hopkins, 222 Conn. 117, 125-26 , 609 A.2d 236 (1992) (court properly admits statement into evidence under Whelan despite witness’ testimony that she was disoriented, dazed, sluggish when she made statement); see also State v. Trotter, 69 Conn. App. 1, 12-14 , 793 A.2d 1172 (court properly admits into evidence statement under Whelan despite evidence that declarant had used heroin on day of …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ROBERT BEEMER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 5, 2002.
799 A.2d 296
Richard Hustad Miller, special public defender, in support of the petition., Theresa A. Ferryman, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 901 (AC 21650), is denied.