State v. Duteau, 835 A.2d 58 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Duteau, 835 A.2d 58 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (51 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Boyd (connappct, 2005-05-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Boyd (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Duteau, 68 Conn. App. 248, 260 , 791 A.2d 591 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939 , 835 A.2d 58 (2002).
cited Cited "see" State v. Abney
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Collins, 68 Conn. App. 828, 835 , 793 A.2d 1160 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 941 , 835 A.2d 58 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Stavrakis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Whitford, 260 Conn. 610, 636 , 799 A.2d 1034 (2002). “[T]he burden to prove the harmfulness of an improper evidentiary ruling is borne by the defendant . . . [who] must show that it is more probable than not that the erroneous action of the court affected the result.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Collins, 68 Conn. App. 828, 831 , 793 A.2d 1160 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 941 , 835 A.2d 58 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Carcare (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
Practice Book § 61-10; see State v. Duteau, 68 Conn. App. 248, 253 , 791 A.2d 591 (setting out procedure for providing adequate record), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939 , 835 A.2d 58 (2002).
cited Cited "see" State v. Johnson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
cited Cited "see" State v. Colon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Collins, 68 Conn. App. 828, 841 , 793 A.2d 1160 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 941 , 835 A.2d 58 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sawyer
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, we have consistently declined to review claims based on a ground different from that raised in the trial court.” (Citations omitted.) State v. Ulen, 31 Conn. App. 20, 27-29 , 623 A.2d 70 , cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905 , 625 A.2d 1378 (1993); see also State v. Collins, 68 Conn. App. 828, 843 , 793 A.2d 1160 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 941 , 835 A.2d 58 (2002); C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sostre
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Among them are the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense conduct or argument . . . the severity of the misconduct . . . the frequency of the misconduct . . . the centrality of the misconduct to the critical issues in the case . . . the strength of the curative measures adopted . . . and the strength of the state’s case.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 675-76; see also State v. Miller, 69 Conn. App. 597, 605 , 795 A.2d 611 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 939 , 802 A.2d 91 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
MACKINTOSH DUTEAU
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 22, 2002.
835 A.2d 58
Reine C. Boyer, special public defender, in support of the petition., Peter A. McShane, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 248 (AC 20047), is denied.