green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Santiago
See State v. Vines , 71 Conn. App. 359 , 366-67, 801 A.2d 918 ("even if the trial court did not engage in the proper inquiry as to the admissibility of evidence, we are mindful of our authority to affirm a judgment of a trial court on a dispositive alternate ground for which there is support in the trial court record" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 939 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Campbell
See State v. Brown, 71 Conn. App. 121, 137-38 , 800 A.2d 674 (concluding that multiple incidents of misconduct did not cumulatively deny defendant fair trial), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 940 , 808 A.2d 1133 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Freedom of Information Commission
See State v. Vines, 71 Conn. App. 359, 367 , 801 A.2d 918 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 939 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryant v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. *436 Bryant, 71 Conn. App. 488 , 802 A.2d 224 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 939 , 808 A.2d 1133 (2002).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Estrella
(4×)
See State v. Bryant, 71 Conn. App. 488, 493-94 , 802 A.2d 224 (concluding trial court properly admitted probable cause hearing testimony when defendant was not limited in ability to cross-examine), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 939 , 808 A.2d 1133 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Crocker
(2×)
See State v. Bryant, 71 Conn. App. 488, 493-94 , 802 A.2d 224 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 939 , 808 A.2d 1133 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jarrett
See State v. Brown, 71 Conn. App. 121, 136 , 800 A.2d 674 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 940 , 808 A.2d 1133 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manson v. Conklin
See, e.g., State v. Vines, 71 Conn. App. 359 , 366–67, 801 A.2d 918 (‘‘even if the trial court did not engage in the proper inquiry as to the admissibility of evidence, we are mindful of our authority to affirm a judgment of a trial court on a dispositive alternat[ive] ground for which there is support in the trial court record’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 939 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002). 4 Although the plaintiff never asked the court to mark the reports as exhibits for identification purposes, the reports are contained in the trial court record. 5 We und…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
The occasional use of rhetorical devices is simply fair argument.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Rogelstad, supra, 73 Conn. App. 31 ; see also State v. Brown, 71 Conn. App. 121, 128 , 800 A.2d 674 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 940 , 808 A.2d 1133 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Guzman
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 71 Conn. App. 272, 286 , 801 A.2d 890 (affirming conviction although misconduct not invited by defense), cert. denied, 261 Conn. 939 , 808 A.2d 1133 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
BERNALE BRYANT
v.
BERNALE BRYANT
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2002.
Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition., Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 71 Conn. App. 488 (AC 21652), is denied.
Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 27, 2002