State v. Henry, 811 A.2d 1293 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Henry, 811 A.2d 1293 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Leandry (connappct, 2015-11-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Leandry
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Henry, 72 Conn. App. 640 , 666–67, 805 A.2d 823 (concluding that court did not abuse dis- cretion in disallowing proposed cross-examination because defense counsel’s statement, ‘‘ ‘I know that he was arrested on this witness’ statement,’ ’’ did not pro- vide substantive information and lacked good faith belief), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 917 , 811 A.2d 1293 (2002).
cited Cited "see" State v. Faison
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Henry, 72 Conn. App. 640, 663 , 805 A.2d 823 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 917 , 811 A.2d 1293 (2002).
cited Cited "see" State v. Williams
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Henry, 72 Conn. App. 640, 667 , 805 A.2d 823 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 917 , 811 A.2d 1293 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ashe
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Henry, 72 Conn. App. 640 , 805 A.2d 823 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 917 , 811 A.2d 1293 (2002); State v. Adams, 72 Conn. App. 734 , 806 A.2d 111 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 916 , 811 A.2d 1292 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Wright
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Henry, 72 Conn. App. 640, 666 , 805 A.2d 823 (‘‘[a] good faith basis on the part of examining counsel as to the truth of the matter contained in questions propounded to a witness on cross-examination is required’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 917 , 811 A.2d 1293 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Torres
N.J. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Henry, 72 Conn.App. 640 , 805 A.2d 823, 837 (affirming trial court’s admission of gang expert’s testimony based on hearsay because “[a]n expert may base his [or her] opinion on facts or data not in evidence, provided they are of a type reasonably relied on by experts in the particular field”)(internal quotation marks omitted), certif. denied, 262 Conn. 917 , 811 A.2d 1293 (2002); Davis, supra, 268 Ill.Dec. 829 , 779 N.E.2d at 458 (rejecting defendant’s hearsay argument and finding expert’s knowledge of gangs based on information of type reasonably relied on by exp…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DARCUS HENRY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 21, 2002.
811 A.2d 1293
Moira L. Buckley, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Robert J. Scheinblum, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

No opinion found.Click here to view source material.