State v. Gauthier, 815 A.2d 137 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Gauthier, 815 A.2d 137 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
81 citation events (81 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Mollo (connappct, 2018-04-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Mollo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas , 73 Conn. App. 830 , 838, 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction
D. Conn. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lewis v. Comm’r of Correction, 73 Conn. App. 597 , 808 A.2d 1164 (2002), cert. de nied, 262 Conn. 938 , 815 A.2d 137 (2003); Lewis v. Warden, No. CV064001783S, 2008 WL 544579 (Conn.Super.Ct.
discussed Cited "see" GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 838 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003); Bank of America, FSB v. Hanlon, 65 Conn. App. 577, 581 , 783 A.2d 88 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction, 73 Conn. App. 597 , 808 A.2d 1164 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 938 , 815 A.2d 137 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Youngs (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gauthier, 73 Conn. App. 781, 789-90 , 809 A.2d 1132 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 137 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Rollar Construction & Demolition, Inc. v. Granite Rock Associates, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 838 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
cited Cited "see" In re William H.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 839 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sinvil (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Guzman, 73 Conn. App. 683, 691 , 809 A.2d 526 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 137 (2003). 7 At no point did the court directly address the prosecutor’s improper remarks.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. Virgulak
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., id. ‘‘In order to establish a prima facie case in a mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff must prove by a prepon- derance of the evidence that it is the owner of the note and mortgage, that the defendant mortgagor has defaulted on the note and that any conditions precedent to foreclosure, as established by the note and mortgage, have been satisfied.’’ GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford, 144 Conn. App. 165, 176 , 73 A.3d 742 (2013), citing Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn. App. 830, 838 , 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 136 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bank of America, N.A. v. Aubut
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, a court may properly grant summary judgment as to liability in a foreclosure action if the complaint and supporting affidavits establish an undisputed prima facie case and the defendant fails to assert any legally sufficient special defense." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Strong, 149 Conn.App. 384 , 390-92, 89 A.3d 392 , cert. denied, 312 Conn. 923 , 94 A.3d 1202 (2014) ; accord GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford, 144 Conn.App. 165 , 176, 73 A.3d 742 (2013) ; see also Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn.App. 830 , 838, 812 A.2d …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Benjamin
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Furthermore, it is well established *236 that “the outcome of a criminal proceeding simply has no relevance whatsoever to an independent determination on the same facts made in a revocation of probation hearing.” State v. Gauthier, 73 Conn. App. 781, 794 , 809 A.2d 1132 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 937 , 815 A.2d 137 (2003); see also id. (“[T]he most that can be said regarding the jury verdict is that the jury found that the alleged criminal conduct had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JOHN GAUTHIER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 14, 2003.
815 A.2d 137
Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition., John A. East III, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

No opinion found.Click here to view source material.