State v. Vitale, 826 A.2d 178 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
State v. Vitale, 826 A.2d 178 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (37 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: North Haven Holdings Ltd. Partnership v. Planning & Zoning Commission (connappct, 2013-10-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" North Haven Holdings Ltd. Partnership v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 76 Conn. App. 222, 229 , 820 A.2d 275 (“[b]ecause the court, in interpreting the regulations, made conclusions of law . . . our review is plenary”), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 177 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Schulhof v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 76 Conn. App. 222, 229 , 820 A.2d 275 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 177 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Just as when we employ a plenary standard of review over the Superior Court’s interpretation of local land use regulations; see Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 76 Conn. App. 222, 229 , 820 A.2d 275 (“[b]ecause the court, in interpreting the regulations, made conclusions of law . . . our review is plenary”), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 177 (2003); we conclude that when a lower court interprets the terms of a variance or its conditions, our review likewise is plenary over that question of law.
cited Cited "see" Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 76 Conn. App. 222, 247 , 820 A.2d 275 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 177 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 76 Conn. App. 222, 247 , 820 A.2d 275 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 177 (2003).
cited Cited "see, e.g." High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 76 Conn. App. 222, 257 , 820 A.2d 275 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 177 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Furthermore, when [an] agency’s determination of a question of law has not previously been subject to judicial scrutiny . . . the agency is not entitled to special deference. . . . [i]£ is for the courts, and not administrative agencies, to expound and apply governing principles of law.’’ (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cunningham v. *23 Planning & Zoning Commission, 90 Conn. App. 273, 279 , 876 A.2d 1257 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 915 , 888 A.2d 83 (2005); see also Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 76 Conn. App. 222, 233 , 820 A.2d 275 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 906…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Coltherst
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Vitale, 76 Conn. App. 1, 10-14 , 818 A.2d 134 (two prejudicial remarks concerning defendant’s misconduct made during testimony before jury), cert, denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 178 (2003); State v. Taveras, supra, 49 Conn. App. 650 -53 (four references made to defendant’s uncharged misconduct during testimony before jury).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JOHN E. VITALE, JR.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 4, 2003.
826 A.2d 178
SULLIVAN, C. J., and KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition., Michael A. D’Onofrio, special public defender, in support of the petition., Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published