green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Petion
See State v. Barretta , 82 Conn. App. 684 , 689, 846 A.2d 946 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 522 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Coltherst
See State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 325 , 844 A.2d 866 , cert, denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert, denied, 543 U.S. 982 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quaranta v. King
Compare State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315 , 327 n.7, 844 A.2d 866 (2004) (inadequate record where defendant failed to mark as exhibit for identification document included in appendix to her brief), cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ovechka
(2×)
Compare, e.g., State v. Rossier, 175 Conn. 204, 206-208 , 397 A.2d 110 (1978) (concluding that multiple contusions and right ankle sprain were not sufficient evidence of "`serious physical injury,'" particularly when evidence presented at trial "consisted primarily of testimony relating to emotional trauma precipitated by the [assault]" [emphasis added]), with State v. Barretta, 82 Conn.App. 684, 690 , 846 A.2d 946 (concluding that extensive bruises and abrasions were sufficient evidence of "serious physical injury"), cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 522 (2004). [17] Given "the difficult…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gonzalez
See, e.g., State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 326 , 844 A.2d 866 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. JOSE G.
(2×)
Compare State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 326 , 844 A.2d 866 (“the record reveals that the substance of what the defendant claims was improperly admitted testimony merely was cumulative of other validly admitted evidence” [emphasis added]), cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trumbull Falls, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission
The process of statutory interpretation involves *22 the determination of the meaning of the statutory language [or . . . the relevant zoning regulation] as applied to the facts of the case, including the question of whether the language does so apply.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Graff v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 277 Conn. 645, 652 , 894 A.2d 285 (2006); see also Blakeman v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 82 Conn. App. 632, 638-39 , 846 A.2d 950 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 521 (2004); Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 67 Conn. App. 597, 604-605 , 789 A…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Christoforo
Tait, Connecticut Evidence (3d Ed. 2001) § 8.16.3 (c), pp. 589-90; see also State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 325 , 844 A.2d 866 (statements made out of court by party opponent universally admissible when offered against him as long as statements relevant, material to issues in case), cert, denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert, denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
Catherine Blakeman Et Al.
v.
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Shelton
v.
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Shelton
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 23, 2004.
Ian A. Cole, in support of the petition., Thomas J. Welch, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 632 (AC 23825), is denied.
[*906] Decided June 23, 2004 Ian A. Cole, in support of the petition. Thomas J. Welch, in opposition.