Gaffey v. Gaffey, 890 A.2d 572 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Gaffey v. Gaffey, 890 A.2d 572 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sowell v. DiCara (connappct, 2015-11-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Sowell v. DiCara
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wasson v. Wasson, 91 Conn. App. 149 , 151 n.1, 881 A.2d 356 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 932 , 890 A.2d 574 (2005).
examined Cited "see" McKeon v. Lennon (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gaffey [v. Gaffey, 91 Conn. App. 801 , 804 n.l, 882 A.2d 715 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 932 , 890 A.2d 572 (2005)].” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) The defendant argued that the plaintiff could not demonstrate a substantial change since the court issued its dissolution orders and that the court’s child support, health insurance and life insurance orders had to be contextualized in light of the total family support awards to the plaintiff and the parties’ children, and the court’s safe harbor provision. 13 See also footnote 2 of this dissent.
discussed Cited "see" JSA Financial Corp. v. Quality Kitchen Corp. of Delaware (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gaffey v. Gaffey, 91 Conn. App. 801 , 804 n.l, 882 A.2d 715 (“[t]he [trial] court is not permitted to decide issues outside of those raised in the pleadings” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 276 Conn. 932 , 890 A.2d 572 (2005); Yellow Page Consultants, Inc. v. Omni Home Health Services, Inc., 59 Conn. App. 194, 200 , 756 A.2d 309 (2000) (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lederle v. Spivey (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Gaffey v. Gaffey, 91 Conn. App. 801 , 882 A.2d 715 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 932 , 890 A.2d 572 (2005). 18 The defendant cites to a page of the court’s memorandum of decision as support for his claim, but we can observe only that it contains the following statement: “[The guardian ad litem] recommended that the court award sole custody to the plaintiff wife.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas GAFFEY
v.
Kathleen A. GAFFEY.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 22, 2005.
890 A.2d 572
Published

Lori Welch-Rubin, in support of the petition.

Thomas S. Luby, Meriden, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 91 Conn.App. 801, 882 A.2d 715 (2005), is denied.