green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Freeman v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
See Costanzo v. Mulshine , 94 Conn. App. 655 , 664-65, 893 A.2d 905 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 911 , 902 A.2d 1070 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Real Estate Mortgage Network, Inc. v. Squillante
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles , 95 Conn. App. 315 , 324, 898 A.2d 197 (noting that passing of law day extinguishes right of equitable redemption and vests title absolutely in mortgagee), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006) ; Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler , 20 Conn. App. 163 , 166, 565 A.2d 252 ("[u]nder our law, an action for strict foreclosure is brought by a mortgagee who, holding legal title, seeks not to enforce a forfeiture but rather to foreclose an equity of redemption unless the mortgagor satisfies the debt on or before his law day"), cert. denied, 213 Conn…
discussed
Cited "see"
Connecticut National Mortgage Co. v. Knudsen
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles , 95 Conn.App. 315 , 321-25, 898 A.2d 197 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006) ; Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler , 20 Conn.App. 163 , 166-68, 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315, 323 , 898 A.2d 197 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dreambuilders Construction, Inc. v. Diamond
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315, 323 , 898 A.2d 197 (“[i]n Connecticut, strict foreclosure is the rule, foreclosure by sale the exception” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tobet v. Tobet
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315 , 320 n.7, 898 A.2d 197 (substance of motion governs its outcome, rather than how it is characterized in title by movant), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timber Trails Associates v. Planning & Zoning Commission
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315, 329 , 898 A.2d 197 (“[o]ur role is not to guess at possibilities, but to review claims based on a complete factual record developed by the trial court” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michaud v. Travel Indemnity Co.
See, e.g., Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315 , 320 n.7, 898 A.2d 197 (‘‘[i]t is the substance of a motion . . . that governs its outcome’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parisi v. Niblett
Plenary review is afforded to issues of subject matter jurisdiction; see, e.g., Temlock v. Tem- lock, 95 Conn. App. 505, 518 , 898 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 910 , 902 A.2d 1070 (2006); and statutory con- struction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Edward Singer
v.
Edward Singer
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 6, 2006.
Mary H. Trainer, special public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 844 (AC 25846), is denied.
[*910] Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 6, 2006