green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of New York v. Bell
(2×)
See Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn.App. 399, 407 , 900 A.2d 525 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Russell
See Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn. App. 399, 407-408 , 900 A.2d 525 (“[w]e are constrained to read a statute as written . . . and we may not read into clearly expressed legislation provisions which do not find expression in its words” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
(2×)
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, supra, 464 U.S. 510 ; see Doe v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, supra, 66; see also Vargas v. Doe, 96 Conn. App. 399, 406-407 , 900 A.2d 525 (2006) (reviewing statutory exceptions allowing closed proceedings), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 923 , 908 A.2d 546 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
TRUMBULL FALLS, LLC
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF TRUMBULL
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF TRUMBULL
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2006.
Thomas J. Welch, in support of the petition., Kevin J. Gumpper, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn. App. 17 (AC 26715), is denied.
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.