green
Positive treatment
9.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morice W.
See State v. Quint , 97 Conn. App. 72 , 93, 904 A.2d 216 (concluding impropriety had not been severe where "it was confined to only a portion of the closing argument"), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1089 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Navaeh W.
(2×)
See In re Halle T., 96 Conn. App. 815 , 839–42, 902 A.2d 670 (court considered respondent’s care for child and efforts at rehabilitation and found termination was in child’s best interests), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1087 (2006); In re Aziza S.-B., supra, 138 Conn. App. 655–59 (court did not fail to consider parent- child relationship).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Daniel A.
(2×)
See In re Halle T., 96 Conn. App. 815 , 838 n.18, 902 A.2d 670 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1087 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Campbell
See State v. Quint, 97 Conn. App. 72, 93 , 904 A.2d 216 (concluding misconduct was not severe where “it was confined to only a portion of the closing argument”), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1089 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Aziza S.-B.
(2×)
See In re Halle T., 96 Conn. App. 815, 828 , 902 A.2d 670 (critical issue is not how court reported findings but whether there is sufficient evidence in record provided by petitioner), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1087 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Abbott Terrace Health Center, Inc. v. Parawich
See Bank of New York v. National Funding, 97 Conn. App. 133, 138 , 902 A.2d 1073 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1087 (2006), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tellar v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
(2×)
See In re Halle T., 96 Conn. App. 815, 824-27 , 902 A.2d 670 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1087 (2006); Wendover Financial Services Corp. v. Connelly, 61 Conn. App. 244, 247 , 763 A2d 670 (2000); Doe v. Bridgeport Hospital, 40 Conn. App. 429, 432-33 , 671 A.2d 405 (1996); Grayson v. Grayson, 4 Conn. App. 275, 284 , 494 A.2d 576 (1985), appeal dismissed, 202 Conn. 221 , 520 A.2d 225 (1987). 4 The defendant also stated in his reply to the plaintiffs opposition that “the plaintiff should not be permitted to force the defendant to incur even more costs in a second lawsuit, particularl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kendall v. Amster
See Kondrat v. Brookfield, 97 Conn. App. 31, 37 , 902 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 926 , 908 A.2d 1087 (2006). 11 It is clear, however, that the defendants filed their appeal challenging the initial order of attachment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Quint v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Quint, 97 Conn. App. 72 , 904 A.2d 216 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1089 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gibson
Ed. 2d 200 (2008); and although there may be some overlap between the factors that the reviewing court considers when determining whether the prosecutor’s conduct was improper and those that it considers when conducting its constitutional analysis; see, e.g., State v. Quint, 97 Conn. App. 72, 88-89 , 904 A.2d 216 (prosecutor’s questions to defendant regarding credibility of witnesses were not improper when invited by defense counsel), cert, denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1089 (2006); a reviewing court should not conclude that the prosecutor’s conduct deprived the defendant of his due p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moore
In conducting this inquiry, we look only to the relevant statutes, the information, and the bill or particulars, not to the evidence presented at trial.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Denson, 67 Conn. App. 803, 808-809 , 789 A.2d 1075 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 915 , 797 A.2d 514 (2002); see also State v. Quint, 97 Conn. App. 72, 78-79 , 904 A.2d 216 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 924 , 908 A.2d 1089 (2006); State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659, 681-82 , 828 A.2d 659 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re HALLE T.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2006.
Published
Steven R. Dembo, Hartford, and P. Jo Anne Burgh, in support of the petition.
Mary-Anne Ziewacz Mulholland, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
The respondent father's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn.App. 815, 902 A.2d 670 (2006), is denied.