green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hampton v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Anderson , 211 Conn. 18 , 35, 557 A.2d 917 (1989) ('[t]he several ways in which sexual intercourse may be committed under General Statutes § 53a-65 [2] are only one conceptual offense')." (Emphasis added.) State v. Griffin , 97 Conn.App. 169 , 184 n.7, 903 A.2d 253 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1088 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vere C.
(2×)
See State v. Griffin, 97 Conn. App. 169, 182 , 903 A.2d 253 (‘‘[a] claim bearing on the defen- dant’s right to a unanimous verdict implicates a funda- mental constitutional right to a fair trial’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1088 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffin v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Griffin, 97 Conn. App. 169, 172-73 , 903 A.2d 253 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1088 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brodia
(2×)
The defendant concedes on appeal that this claim was not preserved at trial but nevertheless seeks to prevail under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 3 Although *402 we conclude that the record is adequate for review and the claim is of constitutional magnitude; see State v. Griffin, 97 Conn. App. 169, 182 , 903 A.2d 253 (“[a] claim bearing on the defendant’s right to a unanimous verdict implicates a fundamental constitutional right to a fair trial” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1088 (2006); the defendant has fail…
cited
Cited "see"
Abbott Terrace Health Center, Inc. v. Parawich
See Bank of New York v. National Funding, 97 Conn. App. 133, 138 , 902 A.2d 1073 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1087 (2006), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Kantorowski
(2×)
Id., 185-86; see also State v. Griffin, 97 Conn. App. 169, 177-78 , 903 A.2d 253 (permissible to argue that the jury should make [the defendant] listen), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1088 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tarasiuk
(2×)
Id., 185-86; see also State v. Griffin, 97 Conn. App. 169, 177-78 , 903 A.2d 253 (permissible to argue that the jury should “ ‘make [the defendant] listen’ ”), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 1088 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brewer
The rationale underlying the requirement is that a jury cannot be deemed to be unanimous if it applies inconsistent factual conclusions to alternative theories of criminal liability.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Martinez, 278 Conn. 598 , 604 n.13, 900 A.2d 485 (2006); see also State v. Griffin, 97 Conn. App. *359 169, 182, 903 A.2d 253 (“[a] claim bearing on the defendant’s right to a unanimous verdict implicates a fundamental constitutional right to a fair trial” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 925 , 908 A.2d 543 (2006).…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Vincent GRIFFIN, Jr.
v.
Vincent GRIFFIN, Jr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2006.
Published
Annacarina Del Mastro, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn.App. 169, 903 A.2d 253 (2006), is denied.