State v. Youngs, 909 A.2d 959 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Youngs, 909 A.2d 959 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
86 citation events (86 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ruocco (conn, 2016-09-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Ruocco
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hicks, 97 Conn.App. 266 , 276-77, 903 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rice (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Youngs, 97 Conn.App. 348 , 363-65, 904 A.2d 1240 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 959 (2006).
cited Cited "see" Mahon v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mahon, 97 Conn. App. 503 , 905 A.2d 678 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jason B.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Coleman, 52 Conn. App. 466, 469 , 727 A.2d 246 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 902 , 732 A.2d 776 (1999). “[Nothing ... in our law, suggests that proof of physical violence is necessary to establish that the sexual intercourse or contact has been compelled by the use of force or a threat of the use of force.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Mahon, 97 Conn. App. 503, 510 , 905 A.2d 678 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d. 958 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. DiFano
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hicks, 97 Conn. App. 266, 277 , 903 A.2d 685 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006). 3 The parties have not briefed the issue of whether the timing of the court’s offer, after the jurors had been released for deliberation, makes a difference to the result of this case.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Russell (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Youngs, 97 Conn. App. 348, 360 , 904 A.2d 1240 (“[a]n impropriety in the court’s jury instruction as to an element of a crime has constitutional implications”), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 959 (2006).
cited Cited "see" State v. D'HAITY
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mahon, 97 Conn. App. 503, 510 , 905 A.2d 678 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alpha Beta Capital Partners, L.P. v. Pursuit Investment Management, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Glinski v. Glinski, 26 Conn. App. 617, 623 , 602 A.2d 1070 (1992) (‘‘[w]hile the trial court may certainly draw adverse inferences from the failure of a party to submit the required financial information, it is under no obligation to do so’’ [emphasis added]); see also Szegda v. Szegda, 97 Conn. App. 426, 430 , 904 A.2d 1266 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 932 , 909 A.2d 959 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Donald H. G.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Walton, 227 Conn. 32, 64-65 , 630 A.2d 990 (1993) (improper jury instructions regarding elements of crime or burden of proof are of constitutional magnitude); see also State v. Hicks, 97 Conn. App. 266, 270, 277 , 903 A.2d 685 (deficientjury instructions regarding drawing of no adverse inference from defendant’s not testifying is of constitutional magnitude), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Radcliffe v. Radcliffe
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Henin v. Henin, 26 Conn. App. 386, 392 , 601 A.2d 550 (1992); see also Szegda v. Szegda, 97 Conn. App. 426, 433 , 904 A.2d 1266 (record disclosed evidence supporting reasonable rationale for award of time limited alimony), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 932 , 909 A.2d 959 (2006).
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Salamon (4×)
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id., at 539-40 , 522 A.2d 277 ; see also State v. Youngs, 97 Conn.App. 348, 363 , 904 A.2d 1240 (characterizing unlawful restraint as specific intent crime), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 959 (2006); State v. Phu Dinh Le, 17 Conn.App. 339, 343 , 552 A.2d 448 (1989) (same); State v. Davis, 13 Conn.App. 667, 672 , 539 A.2d 150 (1988) (same). [29] The dissent maintains that our holding "invades the purview of our state's attorneys" and "appears to overlook that defining crimes is the responsibility of our legislature," not this court.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Carty
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Walton, 227 Conn. 32, 64-65 , 630 A.2d 990 (1993) (erroneous jury instructions regarding elements of crime or burden of proof of constitutional magnitude); see also State v. Hicks, 97 Conn. App. 266, 270 , 903 A.2d 685 (erroneous jury instructions regarding drawing of no adverse inference from defendant’s not testifying of constitutional magnitude), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Sean N. Youngs
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 25, 2006.
909 A.2d 959
Elio C. Morgan, special public defender, in support of the petition., Jessica Probolus, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Vertefeuille.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn. App. 348 (AC 25984), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[*931] Decided October 25, 2006 Elio C. Morgan, special public defender, in support of the petition. Jessica Probolus, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.