green
Positive treatment
10.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
DeLeo v. Equale & Cirone, LLP
(2×)
See State v. Jones , 98 Conn. App. 695 , 696, 911 A.2d 353 (2006) ("[b]ecause we conclude that the defendant's claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, we do not review the merits of his claim"), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 916 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Zen T.
(2×)
See State v. Jones, 98 Conn. App. 695 , 700–701, 911 A.2d 353 (2006), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 916 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007); see also State v. Collazo, 115 Conn. App. 752, 757 , 974 A.2d 729 (2009) (doctrine of collateral estoppel barred defendant from relitigating claim decided in prior appeal), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 929 , 986 A.2d 1057 (2010).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
(4×)
See State v. Jones, 98 Conn. App. 695, 705-706 , 911 A.2d 353 (2006), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 916 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Read
See State v. Smith, 99 Conn. App. 116, 136 , 912 A.2d 1080 , cert. denied, 281 Conn. 917 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Smith, 99 Conn. App. 116, 136 , 912 A.2d 1080 , cert. denied, 281 Conn. 917 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Collazo
(2×)
It also must have been actually decided and the decision must have been necessary to the judgment.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lyon v. Jones, 291 Conn. 384, 406 , 968 A.2d 416 (2009); see also State v. Jones, 98 Conn. App. 695, 704-706 , 911 A.2d 353 (2006) (res judicata barred defendant from raising sufficiently similar claim previously decided), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 916 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Milardo v. Kowaleski
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 99 Conn. App. 116, 136 , 912 A.2d 1080 (whether testimony believable is question solely for juiy), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 917 , 917 A.2d 1000 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Gary Jones
v.
Gary Jones
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 13, 2007.
Gary Jones, pro se, in support of the petition., John P. Gravalec-Pannone, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Palmer.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 695 (AC 26925), is denied.
PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.