green
Positive treatment
9.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Robert S.
See State v. Schultz , 100 Conn. App. 709 , 712 n.2, 921 A.2d 595 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 926 , 926 A.2d 668 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Banks
See State v. Schultz, 100 Conn. App. 709 , 712 n.2, 921 A.2d 595 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 926 , 926 A.2d 668 (2007); see also State v. Geisler, 222 Conn. 672, 684-86 , 610 A.2d 1225 (1992) (providing analytical tools for state constitutional claims).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Singleton
(4×)
See State v. Schultz, 100 Conn.App. 709, 716 , 921 A.2d 595 (trial court's denial of defendant's request to charge on accident or unintended consequences not improper because court instructed jury on element of intent), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 926 , 926 A.2d 668 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Linarte
See State v. Schultz, 100 Conn. App. 709, 730 , 921 A.2d 595 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 926 , 926 A.2d 668 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guarascio v. Guarascio
See Finan v. Finan, 100 Conn. App. 297, 306 , 918 A.2d 910 (upholding award of percentage amount of future cash bonuses paid to defendant *424 rather than set dollar value), cert. granted on other grounds, 282 Conn. 926 , 926 A.2d 666 (2007); Bartel v. Bartel, supra, 98 Conn. App. 713 (holding that court abused discretion by failing to include defendant’s annual bonus as source of income in determining weekly net income); Burns v. Burns, 41 Conn. App. 716, 727-28 , 677 A.2d 971 (upholding order awarding plaintiff 20 percent of defendant’s earned income above his salary base), cert. denied,…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Solomon
See State v. Schultz, 100 Conn. App. 709, 717 , 921 A.2d 595 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 926 , 926 A.2d 668 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meredith Finan
v.
John Finan
v.
John Finan
SC 17918.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 5, 2007.
Charles D. Ray, in support of the petition., Sperry A. DeCew, in opposition.
Rogers.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 297 (AC 26463), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the record was inadequate to review the plaintiffs claims regarding preseparation dissipation of marital assets for ‘adult entertainment’ and cash spending?”
[*927] Decided June 5, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17918. Charles D. Ray, in support of the petition. Sperry A. DeCew, in opposition.ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.