McCullough v. Waterside Assocs., 931 A.2d 264 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
McCullough v. Waterside Assocs., 931 A.2d 264 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Westview Carlton Group, LLC (connappct, 2008-06-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Westview Carlton Group, LLC (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough v. Waterside Associates, 102 Conn. App. 23, 33 , 925 A.2d 352 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 905 , 931 A.2d 264 (2007).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Horner v. Bagnell (2×)
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., LaFond v. Sweeney , supra, 343 P.3d at 946 ; Bader v. Cox , 701 S.W.2d 677 , 682 (Tex. App. 1985) ; see also McCullough v. Waterside Associates , 102 Conn.App. 23 , 30-31, 925 A.2d 352 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 905 , 931 A.2d 264 (2007).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Peruccio v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
When a [petitioner] challenges a conviction, the question is whether there is a reasonable probability that, absent the errors, the factfinder would have had a reasonable doubt respecting guilt.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Bova v. Commissioner of Correction, 95 Conn. App. 129, 134-35 , 894 A.2d 1067 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 920 , 901 A.2d 43 (2006); see also McColl v. Commissioner of Correction, 101 Conn. App. 232, 235-36 , 922 A.2d 180 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 902 , 931 A.2d 264 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul L. McCullough
v.
Waterside Associates Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 5, 2007.
931 A.2d 264
Nicole Liguori Micklich, in support of the petition., Paul L. McCullough, pro se, in opposition.
Rogers.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn. App. 23 (AC 26471), is denied.

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.