Langston v. Comm'r of Corr., 937 A.2d 697 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Langston v. Comm'r of Corr., 937 A.2d 697 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Johnson v. Vita Built, LLC (connappct, 2022-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Vita Built, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Capp Indus- tries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101 , 110 n.6, 932 A.2d 453 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 10 The court’s description of some items being ‘‘above the line’’ and others ‘‘below the line’’ is simply incongruous with the express language of the waterfall provision, which contemplated the payment of all enumerated expenses, including the $126,000 in reinstated fees, as part of the calculation of net profits.
discussed Cited "see" Langston v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Langston v. Commissioner of Correction , 104 Conn. App. 210 , 224, 931 A.2d 967 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 697 (2007).
cited Cited "see" J & E Investment Co. v. Athan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Capp Industries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101 , 109 n.5, 932 A.2d 453 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 , 697 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" Danzig v. PDPA, INC.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Capp Industries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101 , 109 n.5, 932 A.2d 453 (“a judgment of foreclosure is not a final judgment until the trial court determines the method of foreclosure and the amount of the debt”), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 , 697 (2007).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Fezollari v. Jauzovic (3×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although we are cognizant that the trial court is entitled to great deference . . . we nevertheless conclude under the unique circumstances presented here that equity requires a new trial.’’); see also Capp Industries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101, 118 , 932 A.2d 453 (‘‘[u]nder these circumstances, in which the [parties], through no fault of their own, could not have obtained an articulation, it would be unjust to decline summarily to review their claim’’), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007), and cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 697 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard LANGSTON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 5, 2007.
937 A.2d 697
Published

Temmy Ann Pieszak, public defender, in support of the petition.

James A. Killen, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Richard Langston's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn.App. 210, 931 A.2d 967 (2007), is denied.