green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Deane v. Kahn
(2×)
See Christensen v. Reed, 105 Conn. App. 578, 583 , 941 A.2d 333 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 912 , 944 A.2d 982 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Primus
(2×)
See Christensen v. Reed, 105 Conn. App. 578, 583 , 941 A.2d 333 (whether court properly construed burden of party seeking easement by necessity is question of law over which review is plenary), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 912 , 944 A.2d 982 (2008); see also Montanaro v. Aspetuck Land Trust, Inc., 137 Conn. App. 1, 27 , 48 A.3d 107 (whether alternative access precludes finding of easement by necessity is question of law over which review is plenary), cert. denied, 307 Conn. 932 , 56 A.3d 715 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Edmonds
See, e.g., State v. Kimble, 106 Conn.App. 572 , 594-95, 942 A.2d 527 (occupants of parked vehicle not seized when, at night, uniformed police officer exited marked cruiser, approached vehicle, and questioned them), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 912 , 950 A.2d 1289 (2008) ; see also Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 497-98, 103 S.Ct. 1319 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) ("officers do not violate the [f]ourth [a]mendment by merely approaching an individual on the street or in another public place, by asking him if he is willing to answer some questions [or] by putting questions to him if the person is willing …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mark J. CHRISTENSEN
v.
Linda L. REED et al.
v.
Linda L. REED et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 18, 2008.
Published
Lloyd L. Langhammer, Norwich, in support of the petition.
Kathleen M. Cerrone, Woodstock and B. Paul Kaplan, Plainfield, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn.App. 578, 941 A.2d 333 (2008), is denied.