green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Daniel B.
See State v. Green, supra, 194 Conn. 277 (‘‘[t]hese examples are not all-inclusive’’). 11 The dissent points out that ‘‘[t]here is no evidence that the defendant conducted any surveillance [supposedly of T], obtained or furnished a weapon, [or] ‘cased’ the potential crime scene [which was T’s place of employment],’’ and cites State v. Damato, 105 Conn. App. 335 , 343–45, 937 A.2d 1232 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 920 , 949 A.2d 481 (2008), to make the same point.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Ruffin v. Commissioner of Correction , 106 Conn. App. 396 , 400, 943 A.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 922 , 949 A.2d 481 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Grant
See State v. Nieves, 106 Conn. App. 40, 51 , 941 A.2d 358 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 922 , 949 A.2d 482 (2008); see footnote 1 of this opinion.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Joseph
See State v. Damato, 105 Conn. App. 335, 351-52 , 937 A.2d 1232 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 920 , 949 A.2d 481 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Daniel B.
In light of the distinction between the crimes of solicitation and attempt, which ‘‘has persisted for almost eighty years,’’ the Appellate Court reversed the defendant’s conviction because ‘‘[t]he conduct of the defendant con- sisted of a mere solicitation or a mere preparation— that is not enough to constitute an attempt.’’ Id., 171; see also State v. Damato, 105 Conn. App. 335 , 343–45, 937 A.2d 1232 (holding that evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of attempted murder because defendant did not just solicit hitman, he also followed victim and sur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Daniel B.
(2×)
In light **34 of the distinction between the crimes of solicitation and attempt, which "has persisted for almost eighty years," the Appellate Court reversed the defendant's conviction because "[t]he conduct of the defendant consisted of a mere solicitation or a mere preparation-that is not enough to constitute an attempt." Id., at 171, 782 A.2d 209 ; see also State v. Damato , 105 Conn. App. 335 , 343-45, 937 A.2d 1232 (holding that evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction of attempted murder because defendant did not just solicit hitman, he also followed victim and surveilled…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGee v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Ruffin v. Commissioner of Correc- tion, 106 Conn. App. 396, 400 , 943 A.2d 1105 (failure to correct error in presentence investigation report not ineffective assistance because petitioner failed to dem- onstrate that ‘‘the discrepancy would have made a dif- ference in the sentence imposed’’), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 922 , 949 A.2d 481 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Corona v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Ruffin v. Commissioner of Correction, 106 Conn. App. 396, 400 , 943 A.2d 1105 (failure to correct error in presentencing investigation report not ineffective assistance because petitioner failed to demonstrate that “the discrepancy would have made a difference in the sentence imposed”), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 922 , 949 A.2d 481 (2008).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ebron
See id.; see also State v. Damato, 105 Conn. App. 335, 351-52 , 937 A.2d 1232 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 920 , 949 A.2d 481 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Marquez
(2×)
The defendant's citation to our opinion in Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C., 252 Conn. 416 , 747 A.2d 1017 (2000), simply does not support his proposition that our review of this evidence would constitute "an unwarranted interpretation of the evidence before the trial court." [30] For instance, in a case very similar to the present case, both factually and in terms of the claims raised, the Appellate Court concluded, rather persuasively, that, "[g]iven the limited number of studies on the subject [at that time], [the court is] not convinced ... that [the] state constitut…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriguez
See, e.g., State v. Nieves, 106 Conn. App. 40 , 44 n.5, 941 A.2d 358 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 922 , 949 A.2d 482 (2008). 5 At the time of trial, our Supreme Court had not yet rendered its decision in Cortes.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marcellus RUFFIN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 21, 2008.
Published
Mary H. Trainer, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The petitioner Marcellus Ruffin's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn.App. 396, 943 A.2d 1105 (2008), is denied.