green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Signore v. Signore
(2×)
See Krichko v. Krichko, 108 Conn. App. 644, 651 , 948 A.2d 1092 , cert. granted on other grounds, 289 Conn. 913 , 957 A.2d 877 (2008) (appeal withdrawn May 19, 2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D. S. v. D. S.
(2×)
See also Krichko v. Krichko, 108 Conn. App. 644, 650 , 948 A.2d 1092 , cert. granted, 289 Conn. 913 , 957 A.2d 877 (2008) (appeal withdrawn May 19, 2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spencer v. Spencer
(2×)
See also Krichko v. Krichko , 108 Conn. App. 644 , 648-52, 948 A.2d 1092 , cert. granted, 289 Conn. 913 , 957 A.2d 877 (2008) (appeal withdrawn May 19, 2009)." Thus, it determined that alimony terminated on "September 30, 2013, the date [immediately preceding] the plaintiff's cohabitation." With these additional facts in mind, we turn to our analysis of the plaintiff's first *11 challenge to the court's termination of alimony.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Melendez v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., Coleman v. Commissioner of Correc- tion, 108 Conn. App. 836, 838 , 949 A.2d 536 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 913 , 957 A.2d 876 (2008).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Farnum v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 836, 838 , 949 A.2d 536 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 913 , 957 A.2d 876 (2008).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gregory v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 836, 838 , 949 A.2d 536 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 913 , 957 A.2d 876 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kip KRICHKO
v.
Leslie KRICHKO.
v.
Leslie KRICHKO.
18226.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 10, 2008.
Schaller.
Published
David P. Ball, Danbury, in support of the petition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn.App. 644, 948 A.2d 1092 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff's obligation to pay alimony terminated upon the commencement[*878] of the defendant's cohabitation with an unrelated adult male?"
SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this. petition.
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18226.