green
Positive treatment
14.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Smollett
However, the situation is different when the nolle is entered as part of an agreement with the defendant: “A nolle may, however, be bargained for as part of a plea agreement; see State v. Daly, 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400 n.2, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009); Practice Book § 39-5 (2); see also Mason v. State, 302 Md. 434, 440 , 488 A.2d 955 (1985) (nolle as part of plea agreement tantamount to dismissal of nolled charge); or as part of an agreement whereby - 24 - the defendant provides something else of benefit to the state or the victim in exchange for e…
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. Equities Corp. v. Ceraldi
See Urich v. Fish , 112 Conn. App. 837 , 844, 965 A.2d 567 ("[a]s an award of postjudgment interest [pursuant to § 37-3a ] is discretionary, the plaintiff's argument that he is entitled to postjudgment interest as a matter of law [pursuant to § 37-3a ] is premised on a misreading of statutory authority"), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 109 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kallberg
A nolle may, however, be bargained for as part of a plea agreement; see State v. Daly, 111 Conn. App. 397 , 400 n.2, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009); Practice Book § 39-5 (2); see also Mason v. State, 302 Md. 434, 440 , 488 A.2d 955 (1985) (nolle as part of plea agreement tantamount to dismissal of nolled charge); or as part of an agreement whereby the defendant provides something else of ben- efit to the state or the victim in exchange for entry of a nolle.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kallberg
A nolle may, however, be bargained for as part of a plea agreement; see State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400 n.2, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009) ; Practice Book § 39-5 (2) ; see also Mason v. State , 302 Md. 434 , 440, 488 A.2d 955 (1985) (nolle as part of plea agreement tantamount to dismissal of nolled charge); or as part of an agreement whereby the defendant provides something else of benefit to the state or the victim in exchange for entry of a nolle.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dillard
(2×)
See State v. Pereira, 113 Conn. App. 705, 716 , 967 A.2d 121 (“defendant’s act of threatening the victim and her Mend and punching the friend on May 17, 2006, was a less serious matter than the act of holding the child and the knife and threatening to kill himself and the child”), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 106 (2009); State v. Epps, 105 Conn. App. 84, 94 , 936 A.2d 701 (2007) (prior uncharged misconduct was not unduly prejudicial when uncharged misconduct not as brutal as conduct for which defendant charged), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 903 , 943 A.2d 1102 (2008); State v. Iriza…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gaskin
See State v. Na’im B., 113 Conn. App. 790, 801 , 967 A.2d 1234 , cert. denied, 292 Conn. 905 , 973 A.2d 106 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Delacruz-Gomez
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Hughes, 341 Conn. 387, 429 , 267 A.3d 81 (2021); see also State v. Pereira, 113 Conn. App. 705, 715 , 967 A.2d 121 (limiting instructions, which were presumed to have been fol- lowed, ‘‘lessen any prejudice resulting from the admis- sion of [evidence of prior misconduct]’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 106 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Delacruz-Gomez
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Hughes, 341 Conn. 387, 429 , 267 A.3d 81 (2021); see also State v. Pereira, 113 Conn. App. 705, 715 , 967 A.2d 121 (limiting instructions, which were presumed to have been fol- lowed, ‘‘lessen any prejudice resulting from the admis- sion of [evidence of prior misconduct]’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 106 (2009).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Siddiqui
See, e.g., State v. Daly, 111 Conn. App. 397, 401 , 960 A.2d 1040 (2008), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Commissioner of Correction
Small v. Commissioner of Correction , supra, at 717, 946 A.2d 1203 ("[t]he application of historical facts to questions of law that is necessary to determine whether the petitioner has demonstrated prejudice under Strickland ... is a mixed question of law and fact subject to our plenary review"); see also State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008) ("it is well established that as an appellate tribunal, we do not find facts"), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 909 , 973 A.2d 108 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Navarro
"Accordingly, we shall not review at this time ... the defendant's ineffective assistance claim[s] that he contends [are] adequately supported by the record. ... [W]e believe that his ineffective assistance claim[s] should be resolved ... after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Taft , 306 Conn. 749 , 769, 51 A.3d 988 (2012) ; see also State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008) ("it is well established that as an appellate tribunal, we do n…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Navarro
"Accordingly, we shall not review at this time ... the defendant's ineffective assistance [claim] that he contends [is] adequately supported by the record .... [W]e believe that his ineffective assistance [claim] should be resolved ... after an evidentiary hearing in the trial court where the attorney whose conduct is in question may have an opportunity to testify." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Taft , 306 Conn. 749 , 769, 51 A.3d 988 (2012) ; see also State v. Daly , 111 Conn.App. 397 , 400, 960 A.2d 1040 (2008) ("it is well established that as an appellate tribunal, we do not …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriguez
Ed. 2d 527 (1983) (‘‘[an] explicit and detailed description of alleged wrongdoing, along with a statement that the event was observed firsthand, entitles [a] tip to greater weight than might otherwise be the case’’); see also State v. Ocasio, 112 Conn. App. 737, 749 , 963 A.2d 1109 (level of detail of confidential informant’s tip one factor in weighing credibility), cert. denied, 292 Conn. 904 , 973 A.2d 106 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Gerci Pereira
v.
Gerci Pereira
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 3, 2009.
John Serrano, in support of the petition., James A. Killen, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
McLachlan.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 705 (AC 29647), is denied.
McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.