green
Positive treatment
Trending · 51 recent citers
11.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Morant v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 117 Conn. App. 279, 300 , 979 A.2d 507 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 906 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gray
(2×)
See Morant v. Commissioner of Correction, 117 Conn. App. 279, 296 , 979 A.2d 507 (‘‘[i]f . . . the petitioner has failed to meet his burden as to one of the three prongs of the Brady test, then we must con- clude that a Brady violation has not occurred’’), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 906 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Simmons
(2×)
See Morant v. Commissioner of Correction , 117 Conn. App. 279 , 299, 979 A.2d 507 ("[t]his evidence ... taken in context is merely cumulative impeachment evidence and, therefore, not material under Brady "), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 906 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aesthetic & Reconst. Breast v. United Healthcare
See Credit One, LLC v. Head , 117 Conn.App. 92 , 977 A.2d 767 , 770 (App.), cert. denied 294 Conn. 907 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009) (citing Gen.
discussed
Cited "see"
Meletrich v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Morant v. Commissioner of Correction , 117 Conn. App. 279 , 302-304, 979 A.2d 507 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 906 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009) (counsel not ineffective for failing to call alibi witness when witness was not strong and others were available).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spearman v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Morant v. Commissioner of Correction, 117 Conn.App. 279 , 304, 979 A.2d 507 (tactical decision not to call alibi witness where "she was not a strong witness and other alibi witnesses were available"), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 906 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009) ; Hopkins v. Commissioner of Correction, 95 Conn.App. 670 , 675, 899 A.2d 632 (attorney "testified that he had thought [the alibi witness called] would present himself as ... credible ... and, therefore, he did not consider using either of the two women to bolster [alibi witness'] testimony or the alibi defense"), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 911 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Abdullah v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Morant v. Commissioner of Correction, 117 Conn. App. 279 , 283 n.2, 979 A.2d 507 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 906 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009). 3 As noted by the court, this petition for a writ of habeas corpus is one of numerous legal actions that have been filed by the petitioner, including several under his former name, Lawrence Townsend. 4 Practice Book § 23-29 provides in relevant part: “The judicial authority may, at any time, upon its own motion or upon motion of the respondent, dismiss the [habeas] petition ... if it determines that . . . “(2) the petition . . . fails to state a claim …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Garrison
(2×)
The judicial authority hearing such a motion may enter such orders and time limitations as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation, one or more of the following: (1) Requiring the noncomplying party to comply; (2) Granting the moving party additional time or a continuance; (3) Relieving the moving party from making a disclo- sure required by these rules; (4) Prohibiting the noncomplying party from introducing specified evidence; (5) Declaring a mistrial; (6) Dismissing the charges; (7) Imposing appropriate sanctions on the counsel or party, or both, responsible for the noncomplianc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Meletrich v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., Morant v. Commissioner of Correction , 117 Conn. App. 279 , 303-304, 979 A.2d 507 (holding that defense counsel's decision not to call alibi witness was reasonable trial strategy despite counsel's inability to recall details of investigation of witness' testimony because witness was not strong and other alibi witnesses were available), cert. denied, 294 Conn. 906 , 982 A.2d 1080 (2009) ; cf. Gaines v. Commissioner of Correction , 306 Conn. 664 , 683, 51 A.3d 948 (2012) (considering in its analysis defense counsel's complete inability to explain reason for not investigating potential…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Milford
v.
Helen F. Maykut Et Al.
v.
Helen F. Maykut Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 5, 2009.
Robert J. Sickinger, in support of the petition.
Vertefeuille.
Published
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 117 Conn. App. 237 (AC 29177), is denied.
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.