Greenfield v. Reynolds, 4 A.3d 1226 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Greenfield v. Reynolds, 4 A.3d 1226 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Isabella S. (connappct, 2025-03-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In re Isabella S. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Greenfield v. Reynolds, 122 Conn. App. 465, 473 , 1 A.3d 125 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1226 (2010). ‘‘Even satis- faction of this demanding [three-pronged] test does not, however, automatically compel issuance of the requested writ of mandamus. . . .
discussed Cited "see" Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Greenfield v. Reynolds , 122 Conn.App. 465 , 472-73, 1 A.3d 125 (enforcement of zoning regulations is a discretionary act), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1226 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" Reardon v. Zoning Board of Appeals (2×)
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Greenfield v. Rey- nolds, 122 Conn. App. 465 , 472–73, 1 A.3d 125 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1226 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Cancel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
To reach a contrary conclusion would result in an ambush of the trial court by permitting the defendant to raise a claim on appeal that his or her counsel expressly had abandoned in the trial court.” (Citations omitted; emphasis altered; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hampton, 293 Conn. 435, 448-49 , 988 A.2d 167 (2009); see State v. Hudson, 122 Conn. App. 804, 813 , 998 A.2d 1272 (same), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1229 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" Gould v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ankerman v. Commissioner of Correction, 122 Conn. App. 246, 252 , 999 A.2d 789 (petitioner’s claim that state failed to prove element of specific intent “is essentially one of sufficiency of the evidence and not one of actual innocence”), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1225 (2010); People v. Barnslater, 373 Ill.
discussed Cited "see" Brule v. Nerac, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
The plaintiffs’ amended complaint, taken as true and construed in the manner most favorable to sustaining its legal sufficiency; see Greenfield v. Reynolds, 122 Conn. App. 465, 466 , 1 A.3d 125 , cert, denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1226 (2010); asserts the following facts.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council, Inc. v. Esty (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Greenfield v. Reynolds, 122 Conn. App. 465 , 471–72, 1 A.3d 125 (‘‘it is clear that the power to enforce zoning regulations conferred by [General Statutes] § 8-12 on town officials is discretion- ary’’), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 922 , 4 A.3d 1226 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David Greenfield
v.
Susan Reynolds, Zoning Enforcement Officer of the Town of Westport
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 22, 2010.
4 A.3d 1226
Carmine Perri, in support of the petition., Kari L. Olson, in opposition.
Eveleigh.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 465 (AC 30914), is denied.

[*923] Carmine Perri, in support of the petition. Kari L. Olson, in opposition. Decided September 22, 2010

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.