green
Positive treatment
11.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jewelyette M. (Second Dissent)
See In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 830 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); cf. In re James O., supra, 322 Conn. 649 (clear and convincing evidence is burden of proof for termination of parental rights petition).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jewelyette M. (Second Dissent)
See In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 830 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); cf. In re James O., supra, 322 Conn. 649 (clear and convincing evidence is burden of proof for termination of parental rights petition).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Jewelyette M. (Second Dissent)
See In re Kamari C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 830 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); cf. In re James O., supra, 322 Conn. 649 (clear and convincing evidence is burden of proof for termination of parental rights petition).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carlson
See State v. Seekins, 123 Conn. App. 220, 226 , 1 A.3d 1089 (‘‘[t]his court repeatedly has refused to apply the consciousness of innocence principle to jury instruc- tions regarding a consciousness of guilt’’), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010); see also State v. Holley, 90 Conn. App. 350, 365 , 877 A.2d 872 (‘‘[e]ven in cases in which a defendant has explained his flight, an instruction that flight is circumstantial evidence of guilt need not be accom- panied by a discussion by the court of the benign explanations for flight offered by the defendant’’), cert. den…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Iliana M.
A motion to dismiss tests, inter alia, whether, on the face of the *388 record, the court is without jurisdiction. . . . [0]ur review of the trial court’s ultimate legal conclusion and resulting [decision to deny] . . . the motion to dismiss will be de novo.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Addie May Nesbitt, 124 Conn. App. 400, 407-408 , 5 A.3d 518 , cert. denied, 299 Conn 917, 10 A.3d 1051 (2010); see generally Keller v. Beckenstein, 122 Conn. App. 438, 442-43 , 998 A.2d 838 , cert. granted on other grounds, 298 Conn. 921 , 4 A.3d 1227 , 5 A.3d 486 (2010).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Ja-lyn R.
See In re Kamcuri C-L., 122 Conn. App. 815, 824-25, 829-30 , 2 A.3d 13 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 927 , 5 A.3d 487 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Corine CARR
v.
CONNEX CREDIT UNION.
v.
CONNEX CREDIT UNION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 29, 2010.
Published
Corine Carr, pro se, in support of the petition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn.App. 901, 995 A.2d 649 (2010), is denied.