green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dojnia
Additionally, we conclude that because a claim that a statute is vague as applied to a defendant implicates the constitutional guarantee of due process that is enshrined in the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution; see, e.g., State v. Pettigrew, 124 Conn. App. 9 , 24–25, 3 A.3d 148 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 916 , 10 A.3d 1052 (2010); the claim is of constitutional magnitude.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dojnia
Additionally, we conclude that because a claim that a statute is vague as applied to a defendant implicates the constitutional guarantee of due process that is enshrined in the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution; see, e.g., State v. Pettigrew , 124 Conn. App. 9 , 24-25, 3 A.3d 148 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 916 , 10 A.3d 1052 (2010) ; the claim is of constitutional magnitude.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALEXIAS PIZZA, LLC
v.
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 1, 2010.
Published
Clifford S. Thier, West Hartford, in support of the petition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn.App. 901, 4 A.3d 351 (2010), is denied.