Berzins v. Berzins, 10 A.3d 521 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Berzins v. Berzins, 10 A.3d 521 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Grant, No. AC35053 (Conn. App. Ct. Dec. 23, 2014)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 637 cited at this page1 citing case
  • State v. Holley, 72 A.3d 1279 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013).published 2 cites
    A prosecutor’s frequent and gratuitous use of sarcasm can [call on] the jurors’ feelings of disdain, and likely sen[d] them the message that the use of sarcasm, rather than reasoned and moral judgment, as a method of argument [is] permissi…
At page 642 cited at this page1 citing case
  • State v. Grant, No. AC35053 (Conn. App. Ct. Dec. 23, 2014).published
    The occasional use of rhetorical devices is simply fair argu- ment.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 642. ‘‘[S]ome use of sarcastic and informal language, when intended to forcefully criticize a defense theory on the permissible…
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mary Berzins
v.
David Berzins
SC 18708.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 4, 2010.
Published opinion
10 A.3d 521
2010 Conn. LEXIS 428
Linda C. Lehmann, in support of the petition.
Published

The substitute defendant administrator’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 674 (AC 30946), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision to order the substitute defendant administrator to pay the attorney’s fees of the plaintiff pursuant to Ramin v. Ramin, 281 Conn. 324, 915 A.2d 790 (2007)?”