Carmichael v. Stonkus, 39 A.3d 1121 (Conn. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Carmichael v. Stonkus, 39 A.3d 1121 (Conn. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jordan v. Biller (connappct, 2018-09-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Jordan v. Biller (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carmichael v. Stonkus , 133 Conn. App. 302 , 308-309, 34 A.3d 1026 , cert. denied, 304 Conn. 911 , 39 A.3d 1121 (2012).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hearl (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carmichael v. Stonkus , 133 Conn. App. 302 , 308, 34 A.3d 1026 , cert. denied, 304 Conn. 911 , 39 A.3d 1121 (2012).
discussed Cited "see" Fishbein v. Menchetti (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carmichael v. Stonkus, 133 Conn.App. 302 , 307, 34 A.3d 1026 , cert. denied, 304 Conn. 911 , 39 A.3d 1121 (2012).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Alba P.-V. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carmichael v. Stonkus, 133 Conn. App. 302, 307 , 34 A.3d 1026 , cert. denied, 304 Conn. 911 , 39 A.3d 1121 (2012). *754 Likewise, we are not persuaded by the respondent’s argument that dismissal of the present matter will foreclose her ability to challenge the substantiations administratively.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Homebridge Financial Services, Inc. v. Jakubiec (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
In addition, brief- ing is inadequate when it is not only short, but confus- ing, repetitive, and disorganized.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Wells Fargo Bank, National Assn. v. Doreus, 218 Conn. App. 77 , 79 n.1, 290 A.3d 921 , cert. denied, 347 Conn. 904 , 297 A.3d 198 (2023); see also Carmichael v. Stonkus, 133 Conn. App. 302, 307 , 34 A.3d 1026 , cert. denied, 304 Conn. 911 , 39 A.3d 1121 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stanrod T. CARMICHAEL et al.
v.
John J. STONKUS et al.
Not in source.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 21, 2012.
39 A.3d 1121
McLachlan.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published

Eddi Z. Zyko, Middlebury, in support of the petition.

John M. Wolfson, Hartford, and Benjamin M. Wattenmaker, in opposition.

The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 302, 34 A.3d 1026, is denied.

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.