State v. Rice, 150 A.3d 232 (Conn. 2016). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Rice, 150 A.3d 232 (Conn. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Frederik H. (connappct, 2020-04-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Frederik H.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rice, 167 Conn. App. 615 , 622 n.4, 142 A.3d 1267 (one can have more than one intent at given time), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 932 , 150 A.3d 232 (2016).
cited Cited "see" State v. Frederik H.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rice, 167 Conn. App. 615 , 622 n.4, 142 A.3d 1267 (one can have more than one intent at given time), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 932 , 150 A.3d 232 (2016).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Meadows
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Baker , 168 Conn. App. 19 , 21 n.5, 145 A.3d 955 , cert. denied, 323 Conn. 932 , 150 A.3d 232 (2016). 5 Under the well established principles of Golding , as revised in In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), a defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged constitutional violation exists and deprived the defen…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bester
Conn. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Rice, 167 Conn. App. 615, 627 , 142 A.3d 1267 (rejecting confrontation clause claim challenging prosecutor’s inquiry of witness because questions are not evidence), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 932 , 150 A.3d 232 (2016).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rivera
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Given the present circumstances, in which the defendant may seek and obtain any appropriate redress before the trial court, we are not persuaded that ... review of the claim *278 under Golding ... is warranted ...." Id., at 592 , 997 A.2d 546 ; see also State v. Baker , 168 Conn.App. 19 , 21 n.6, 145 A.3d 955 ("[t]his court previously has recognized that [i]t is not appropriate to review an unpreserved claim [pertaining to a motion to correct] an illegal sentence for the first time on appeal" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 932 , 150 A.3d 232 (2016).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Terrance L. RICE
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 25, 2016.
150 A.3d 232
Published

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 167 Conn.App. 615, 142 A.3d 1267 (2016), is denied.