green
Positive treatment
9.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hargett
See State v. Medina, 170 Conn. App. 609 , 613–14, 155 A.3d 285 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 914 , 159 A.3d 231 (2017). 25 See State v. Williams, 204 Conn. 523, 540 , 529 A.2d 653 (1987). 26 In Albino, however, our Supreme Court did not issue a blanket rule prohibiting a prosecutor from arguing that a defendant murdered a victim ‘‘in cold blood’’ but acknowledged that such an argument may be proper in certain circumstances.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Berrios
See State v. Rios , 171 Conn. App. 1 , 49-50, 156 A.3d 18 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 914 , 159 A.3d 232 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
See State v. Rios , 171 Conn. App. 1 , 23, 156 A.3d 18 (amended information clearly charged defendant with multiple counts of intentional assault and reckless endangerment because "[the amended information] did not in any way suggest that [the separate offenses] represented alternative theories of liability"), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 914 , 159 A.3d 232 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ragalis
See General Statutes § 53a-3 (7) (‘‘ ‘[d]angerous instrument’ means any instrument, article or substance which, under the circumstances in which it is used or attempted or threatened to be used, is capable of causing death or serious physical injury, and includes a ‘vehicle’ as that term is defined in this section’’); see also, e.g., State v. Rios, 171 Conn. App. 1, 26 , 156 A.3d 18 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 914 , 159 A.3d 232 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Calderon-Perez
App. 637, 642 , 754 S.E.2d 478 , review denied, 367 N.C. 518 , 762 S.E.2d 443 (2014); Stone v. State, 635 S.W.3d 763 , 770 (Tex. App. 2021); see also State v. Rios, 171 Conn. App. 1, 41 , 156 A.3d 18 (‘‘[n]umerous courts have upheld the admission of tattoo evidence after weighing the probative value of the evidence versus its prejudicial effects’’), cert. denied, 325 Conn 914 , 159 A.3d 232 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McCleese
See, e.g., Perez v. Commissioner of Correction, 326 Conn. 357 , 382 and n.10, 163 A.3d 597 (2017). 25 Section 53a-54b was amended by No. 12-5, § 1, of the 2012 Public Acts to substitute ‘‘murder with special circumstances’’ for ‘‘capital felony.’’ State v. Medina, 170 Conn. App. 609 , 610 n.1, 155 A.3d 285 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 914 , 159 A.3d 231 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McCleese
See, e.g., Perez v. Commissioner of Correction, 326 Conn. 357 , 382 and n.10, 163 A.3d 597 (2017). 25 Section 53a-54b was amended by No. 12-5, § 1, of the 2012 Public Acts to substitute ‘‘murder with special circumstances’’ for ‘‘capital felony.’’ State v. Medina, 170 Conn. App. 609 , 610 n.1, 155 A.3d 285 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 914 , 159 A.3d 231 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dunbar
See, e.g., State v. Medina , 170 Conn. App. 609 , 613, 155 A.3d 285 (unless defendant has demonstrated that record is adequate for appellate review, appellate tribunal will not consider merits of defendant's claim), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 914 , 159 A.3d 231 (2017).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Jose E. MEDINA
v.
Jose E. MEDINA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 12, 2017.
Published
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 170 Conn. App. 609, 155 A.3d 285 (2017), is denied.
ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.