L. E. Coggins, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Harold Montgomery, Defendant-Appellant-Cross, 433 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1970). · Go Syfert
L. E. Coggins, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Harold Montgomery, Defendant-Appellant-Cross, 433 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Autotrol Corp. v. J-F Equipment Co. (txnd, 1993-05-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Autotrol Corp. v. J-F Equipment Co.
N.D. Tex. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gardner v. Shearson, Hammill & Company, 433 F.2d 367 , 368 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 978 , 91 S.Ct. 1209 , 28 L.Ed.2d 329 (1971); Universal American Barge Corp. v. J-Chem, Inc., 946 F.2d 1131, 1136 (5th Cir.1991); Pujol v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 829 F.2d 1201, 1206 (1st Cir.1987); Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Incorporated, 763 F.2d 1352, 1361 (11th Cir.1985); Davis v. Chevy Chase Financial Limited, 667 F.2d 160, 172 (D.C.Cir.1981). 7 By applying the concept of claim preclusion to arbitration decisions, the courts have acknowledged the value of arbitration an…
discussed Cited "see" Edward L. Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Incorporated
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
Schattner v. Girard, Inc., 668 F.2d 1366, 1369 (D.C.Cir.1981); Davis v. Chevy Chase Financial Ltd., 667 F.2d 160, 172 (D.C.Cir.1981); see Gardner v. Shearson Hammill & Co., 433 F.2d 367 , 368 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 978 , 91 S.Ct. 1209 , 28 L.Ed.2d 329 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Dunlap v. Wild
Wash. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See *588 also Gardner v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 433 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1970); Moran v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, 389 F.2d 242 (3d Cir. 1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,703 John D. Laupheimer v. McDonnell & Co., Inc.
2d Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Gardner v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 433 F.2d 367 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 978 , 91 S.Ct. 1209 , 28 L.Ed. 329 (1971); Moran v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, 389 F.2d 242 (3d Cir. 1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
L. E. Coggins, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross
v.
Harold Montgomery, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
18-41150.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 15, 1970.
433 F.2d 367
Published

433 F.2d 367

L. E. COGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant,
v.
Harold MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee.

No. 29069.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1970.

Frank A. Riley, Tupelo, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

Roy O. Parker, Tupelo, Miss., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court, Northern District of Mississippi; William C. Keady, Chief Judge.

Before TUTTLE, BELL and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.[1]

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)