green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“specific objection to a ruling of trial judge is a condition precedent to a motion for new trial based on error in connection with such ruling.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cook v. Erie Insurance Company
specific objection to a ruling of trial judge is a condition precedent to a motion for new trial based on error in connection with such ruling.
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Commissioner
See Smith v. Commissioner , 84 T.C. 889 , 909 (1985) (citing Rosen v. Commissioner , 62 T.C. 11 , 19 (1974) , affd. without published opinion 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir. 1975)) (holding that "So long as the transferred property remains liable on the debt, then, such debt can be a section 357(c) liability even if petitioner retained personal, unrelieved liability on it."), affd. without published opinion 805 F.2d 1073 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Owen v. Commissioner
See Rosen v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 11 (1974) , affd. without published opinion 515 F.2d 507 ↩ 93 d Cir. 1975). *.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bragg
(2×)
See Owens v. United States, 383 F.Supp. 780 (M.D.Pa.1974), aff 'd. 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 996 , 96 S.Ct. 425 , 46 L.Ed.2d 371 (1975); U.S. ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Armstrong
See, Owens v. United States, 383 F.Supp. 780 (M.D.Pa. 1974), aff’d mem. 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir.1975) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 996 , 96 S.Ct. 425 , 46 L.Ed.2d 371 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Marks v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Weaver v. Ford Motor Company, 382 F.Supp. 1068, 1075 (E.D.Pa. 1974) , aff’d mem., 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir. 1975) .
cited
Cited "see"
Ernst v. Ace Motor Sales, Inc.
See Weaver v. Ford Motor Co., 382 F.Supp. 1068, 1075 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff’d, 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slodov v. United States
See Rubin v. United States, 380 F. Supp. 1176, 1179 (WD Pa. 1974), aff’d, 515 F. 2d 507 (CA3 1975); Louisville Credit Men’s Assn., Inc. v. United States, 73-2 USTC ¶ 9740 (ED Ky. 1970); Tiffany v. United States, 228 F. Supp. 700 (NJ 1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See State v. Isbell, supra, at 425 ; Adams v. Harris County, supra, at 608 (both expressly holding that consent to sue may be given by concurrent resolution, but that waiver of immunity from tort liability can be given only by general law); see also Thomas v. Government of Virgin Islands, 333 F. Supp. 961 (D.V.I. 1971), aff'd, 515 F.2d 507 (1975) (holding that waiver of sovereign immunity on behalf of individual violates equal protection clause of federal Constitution); Krause v. Ohio, 285 N.E.2d 736 (Ohio), appeal dismissed, 409 U.S. 1052 (1972) (holding that withholding remedy from some pers…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Diznoff
See also Kovacs v. Goodman, 383 F.Supp. 507 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff’d 515 F.2d 507 (3d Cir.1975). 3 Plaintiff’s invocation of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 , has no moment since the statute applies only to government agencies.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walter S. Brackett
See also Owens v. United States, 383 F.Supp. 780 (M.D.Pa.1974), aff'd without opinion, 515 F.2d 507 (3rd Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 996 , 96 S.Ct. 425 , 46 L.Ed.2d 370 (1975), in which the District Court, in a carefully considered opinion, held Dorszynski non-retroactive in the context of a 2255 motion Our limitation of the retroactivity of Dorszynski is concededly at odds with holdings in other circuits.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Horniak
v.
Horniak
74-2146.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 7, 1975.
515 F.2d 507
U. S.
v.
Horniak
74-2146
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
5/7/75
1
D.N.J.
AFFIRMED