Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Adm'r, U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, 921 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. Adm'r, U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, 921 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Coalition for Sustainable Resources, Inc. v. United States Forest Service (ca10, 2001-08-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Coalition for Sustainable Resources, Inc. v. United States Forest Service
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., NRDC v. Adm’r, EPA, 902 F.2d 962 , 983 (D.C.Cir.1990) (opinion of Wald, C.J.) (stating that if an agency “explicitly determines after review” not to change a rule, “that decision would, in most situations, ... be final”), vacated by voluntary dismissal, 921 F.2d 326 (D.C.Cir.1991); cf. id. at 989 (opinion of Edwards, J.) (stating that inaction is final when the agency has completed a rulemaking and there is “some clear indication that the disputed issue was considered during the rulemaking procedure”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
E.D. Va. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court therefore adopted the following procedure: 1) persons seeking revision must petition EPA to revise the standard in question, together with supporting materials or references to supporting materials; 2) EPA must respond to the petition and, if it denies it, set forth its reasons; and 3) if the petition is denied, petitioner may seek review. 13 Id.; see also NRDC, Inc. v. Administrator, USEPA, 902 F.2d 962 , 988 (D.C.Cir.1990) (Wald, C.J.) (ordering EPA to provide court within 60 days with “clear and cogent reasons” why it had not acted for 10 years past statutory deadline for revi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
v.
Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
20-1034.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jan 2, 1991.
921 F.2d 326
Published

921 F.2d 326

287 U.S.App.D.C. 286

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al.,
Respondents.

Nos. 87-1438 to 87-1443, 88-1913 and 89-1013.

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 2, 1991.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of the motion of petitioners in case No. 87-1438 for voluntary dismissal and of the response thereto it is

2

ORDERED, by the court, that the motion is granted and case no. 87-1438 is dismissed. The consolidation of no. 87-1438 with the remaining cases is vacated.

3

It is Further Ordered, by the court, that Part IV of the court's opinion of April 27, 1990, and the separate opinions of Chief Judge Wald and Circuit Judges Edwards and Silberman which follow Part IV, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

4

The Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this order to Respondent, in lieu of a partial, formal mandate.