green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Royal
(2×)
Id. at 220 ; see also Maxey v. Wright, 54 S.W. 807, 809-10, 812 (Indian Terr.) (upholding Creek occupancy tax imposed on non-member lawyers practicing law within the Creek Nation), aff’d, 105 F. 1003 (8th Cir. 1900). 4) Post-allotment evidence Mr. Murphy and the Tribe argue contemporary historical evidence shows an understanding that the Creek Nation’s borders continued after allotment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Royal
Id. at 220; see also Maxey v. Wright, 54 S.W. 807, 809-10, 812 (Indian Terr.) (upholding Creek occupancy tax imposed on non-member lawyers practicing law within the Creek Nation), aff'd, 105 F. 1003 (8th Cir. 1900). 4) Post-allotment evidence Mr. Murphy and the Tribe argue contemporary historical evidence shows an understanding that the Creek Nation’s borders continued after' allotment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THE MOHEGAN
No. 23.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 21, 1900.
Samuel Park, for appellant., Le Roy S. Gove, for appellee.-
Laoombe, Shipman, Wallace.
Published
No opinion. Decree of district court (91 Fed. 810) affirmed.