Kearns v. Dunbar, 292 F. 1013 (D. Utah 1922). · Go Syfert
Search
Kearns v. Dunbar, 292 F. 1013 (D. Utah 1922). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lever Brothers Co. v. United States of America (cadc, 1989-06-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lever Brothers Co. v. United States of America (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1989 · confidence medium
The Second Circuit described the US firm A. Bourjois & Co. as having acquired the “exclusive right to manufacture and sell in the United States any and all toilet preparations now made by [Wertheimer & Cie.].” See A. Bourjois & Co. v. Aldridge, 292 F. 1013, 1013-14 (2d Cir.1922) (per curiam).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Eighty-Nine (89) Bottles of \Eau de Joy\""
unknown court · 1986 · confidence medium
A. Bourjois & Co. v. Aldridge, 263 U.S. 675 , 44 S.Ct. 4 , 68 L.Ed. 501 (1923) (per curiam) (answering questions certified in A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. Aldridge, 292 F. 1013, 1014 (2d Cir.1922) (per curiam)); see also Vivitar, 761 F.2d at 1564 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Eighty-Nine Bottles of Eau De Joy
unknown court · 1986 · confidence medium
A. Bourjois & Co. v. Aldridge, 263 U.S. 675 , 44 S.Ct. 4 , 68 L.Ed. 501 (1923) (per curiam) (answering questions certified in A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. Aldridge, 292 F. 1013, 1014 (2d Cir.1922) (per curiam)); see also Vivitar, 761 F.2d at 1564 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Vivitar Corporation v. The United States, and 47th Street Photo, Inc., Intervenor (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. Aldridge, 292 Fed. 1013, 1014 (2d Cir.1922).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KEARNS
v.
DUNBAR
No. 6415.
District Court, D. Utah.
Jan 13, 1922.
292 F. 1013
George Jay Gibson, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiff., Charles M. Morris, U. S. Atty., of Salt Lake City, Utah, for defendant.
Johnson.
Published
JOHNSON, District Judge.

In Dixon v. Ricketts, 26 Utah, 215, 72 Pac. 947, the Supreme Court, in construing the inheritance tax statute enacted by the Legislature of the state in 1901 (Laws 1901, c. 62), adopted what is known as the Pennsylvania rule. I do not think that court, in its opinion in Re Bullen’s Estate, 47 Utah, 96, 151 Pac. 533, L. R. A. 1916C, 670, changed or intended to change the rule announced in 'Dixon v. Ricketts.

The national courts, in construing a state statute, adopt the construction given the statute by the court of last resort of the state. Applying the Pennsylvania rule, the demurrer of the defendant must be overruled; and it is so ordered.

: The defendant will be given 10 days in which to answer the complaint.