Piccard v. Sperry Corp., 120 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1941). · Go Syfert
Search
Piccard v. Sperry Corp., 120 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Webster Eisenlohr, Inc. v. Kalodner (ca3, 1944-09-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Webster Eisenlohr, Inc. v. Kalodner
3rd Cir. · 1944 · signal: see · confidence high
See Piccard v. Sperry Corporation, D.C.N.Y.1941, 36 F.Supp. 1006 , affirmed, 2 Cir.,1941, 120 F.2d 328 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dudley Warren Schilling, Cross v. J. A. Belcher, Sr., Cross Dudley Warren Schilling v. J. A. Belcher, Sr.
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Gallup v. Caldwell, 120 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir. 1941) and Piccard v. Sperry Corp., 36 F.Supp. 1006 (S.D.N.Y.1941), aff’d without opinion, 120 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1941) with Kenrich Corp. v. Miller, 377 F.2d 312 (3rd Cir. 1967) and Heit v. Tenneco, Inc., 319 F.Supp. 884 (D.Del.1970). 2 . 608.131 Stockholders’ derivative actions; security for expenses In any action commenced or maintained by a stockholder of any domestic or foreign corporation to procure a judgment in its favor: (1) It must be made to appear that the plaintiff is a stockholder of such corporation at the time of bringing the …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jules E. PICCARD, on behalf of himself and for the benefit of and on behalf of the defendant, The Sperry Corporation, and all other stockholders of said defendant, The Sperry Corporation, who may be similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SPERRY CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees, Consolidated Investing Corporation, Appellant.
318.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 5, 1941.
120 F.2d 328
L. Hand, Chase, and Clark, Circuit Judges.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Weinstein & Levinson, of New York City (Frank Weinstein and Samuel J. Levinson, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Consolidated Investing Corporation.

A. Joseph Geist, of New York City (George E. Netter, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Jules E. Piccard.

Chadbourne, Wallace, Parke & Whiteside, of New York City, for defendants Sperry Corporation and others.

Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City, for defendant J. Russell Forgan and others.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order, 36 F.Supp. 1006, affirmed in open court.