Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Leviski, 128 F.2d 924 (6th Cir. 1942). · Go Syfert
Search
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Leviski, 128 F.2d 924 (6th Cir. 1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. (ca2, 1982-03-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1982 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 2.78, at 390.23 n.35 (14th ed.) with In re Rosenberg, 128 F.2d 924 (7 Cir. 1942).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.
v.
LEVISKI
No. 9065.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 1, 1942.
128 F.2d 924
McAfee, Grossman, Hanning & Newcomer, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant., Herschel G. Holland, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Hicks, Martin, Simons.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This cause having been heard upon the record, and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the parties, and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment entered thereon; and no reversible error being found in the record, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.