Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. Distelhorst, 150 F.2d 541 (8th Cir. 1945). · Go Syfert
Search
Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. Distelhorst, 150 F.2d 541 (8th Cir. 1945). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lusardi v. Lechner (ca3, 1988-08-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Lusardi v. Lechner
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Distelhorst v. Day & Zimmerman, 58 F.Supp. 334, 335 (S.D.Iowa 1944) (holding any common issue of fact meets the similarly situated test of FLSA § 16(b)), appeal dismissed, 150 F.2d 541 (8th Cir.1945).
discussed Cited "see" Jules Lusardi, Walter N. Hill, James Marr, Jr., John F. Weiss, Arthur Brickman, Martin J. Cocca, Carl B. Heisler, Raymond C. Loyer, Donald P. Miller, Robert C. Patterson, Anthony T. Salvatore, Eldon Sheldon, Michael Sylvestri, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, at No. 87- 5901 v. Honorable Alfred J. Lechner, Jr., United States District Judge, Nominal Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation, Jules Lusardi, Walter N. Hill, James Marr, Jr., John F. Weiss, Arthur Brickman, Martin J. Cocca, Carl B. Heisler, Raymond C. Loyer, Donald P. Miller, Robert C. Patterson, Anthony T. Salvatore, Eldon Sheldon, Michael Sylvestri, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, at No. 87- 5902 v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Distelhorst v. Day & Zimmerman, 58 F.Supp. 334, 335 (S.D.Iowa 1944) (holding any common issue of fact meets the similarly situated test of FLSA Sec. 16(b)), appeal dismissed, 150 F.2d 541 (8th Cir.1945). 50 In making that argument, Lusardi relies on United States Postal Serv.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DAY & ZIMMERMAN, Inc.
v.
Fred DISTELHORST
No. 13128.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jul 10, 1945.
150 F.2d 541
Maurice F. Donegan, U. S. Atty., of Davenport, Iowa, Cloid I. Level, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Des Moines, Iowa, and William. R. Sheridan, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Keokuk,. Iowa, for appellant., Havner & Powers, of Des Moines, Iowa, and Clark, Pryor, Hale & Plock, of Burlington, Iowa, for appellees.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court, 58 F.Supp’.. 334, docketed and dismissed without costs-to either party in this Court, on motion of appellant and consent of appellees.